Understanding Laws of Logs: How to Derive Chemistry Kinetics Equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mycotheology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the first-order kinetics equation, specifically how the equation [A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt} is obtained from the natural logarithm transformation. The user initially misapplies the properties of logarithms, leading to an incorrect equation. The correct derivation involves applying the exponential function to both sides after isolating ln[A], which confirms that [A] is indeed equal to [A]_{0} multiplied by e^{-kt}. The key takeaway is the proper use of exponentiation in logarithmic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural logarithms and their properties
  • Familiarity with exponential functions
  • Basic knowledge of chemical kinetics
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the integrated rate laws for first-order reactions
  • Learn about the application of logarithmic and exponential functions in chemistry
  • Explore the concept of half-life in first-order kinetics
  • Investigate graphical methods for determining reaction rates
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators in chemical kinetics, and professionals involved in reaction rate analysis will benefit from this discussion.

mycotheology
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and here's something I don't get. How does this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-6.gif
get turned into this:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}[/itex]?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
[itex]ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt[/itex].
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
[itex]ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt[/itex]
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}[/itex].
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mycotheology said:
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and here's something I don't get. How does this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-6.gif
get turned into this:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}[/itex]?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
[itex]ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt[/itex].
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
[itex]ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt[/itex]
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}[/itex].
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.

The red part is the wrong part.
By reverse you use e as a index for exponentiation, so let's say :
ln a = ln b - c
e^(ln a) = e^(ln b - c)
u got your exponentialtion wrong.
 
mycotheology said:
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and here's something I don't get. How does this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-6.gif
get turned into this:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}[/itex]?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
[itex]ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt[/itex].
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
[itex]ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt[/itex]
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}[/itex].
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.

The easiest method to see this is to apply the exponential to each side.

##
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle ln\frac{[A]}{[A]_0} &=& -kt\\
\displaystyle e^{ln\frac{[A]}{[A]_0}}&=& e^{-kt}\\
\displaystyle \frac{[A]}{[A]_0} &=& e^{-kt}\\
\displaystyle [A] &=& [A]_0 e^{-kt}\\
\end{eqnarray*}
##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K