Integrating the differential rate equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration of differential rate equations for 0th and 1st order reactions in chemistry. The 0th order reaction is represented by the equation Rate = -d[A]/dt = k, which integrates to [A] = -kt + [A]₀. The confusion arises from the integration process and the treatment of the differential 'd'. For the 1st order reaction, the integration of d[A]/[A] leads to ln[A], clarified by the integral ∫(1/x) dx = ln|x| + C. The importance of proper notation in integration is emphasized to avoid misunderstanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations in chemistry
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Familiarity with 0th and 1st order reaction kinetics
  • Basic concepts of limits of integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration of differential equations in chemical kinetics
  • Learn about the application of Riemann sums in calculus
  • Explore the derivation of integrated rate laws for various reaction orders
  • Review proper notation and conventions in calculus to avoid confusion
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in chemical kinetics and reaction rate analysis will benefit from this discussion.

mycotheology
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Heres the differential rate equation for a 0 order reaction in chemistry:
[itex]Rate = {{-d[A]} / {dt}} = k[/itex]
which can be rearranged to this:
[itex]-d[A] = dt k[/itex]
and when you integrate this you get the integrated rate equation but I don't understand how this works. The site I'm reading says you integrate both sides of the equation and get this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord_z5.gif
is that supposed to be a definite integral or something? Anyhow, after integrating they get this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord_z3.gif
I don't get it. Firstly [A] and t are variables so shouldn't they be raised a power and get divided by 2? In other words, shouldn't they become [itex][A]^{2} / 2[/itex] and [itex]t^{2} / 2[/itex]? Secondly, what's going on with the d. d means the change in something but I've never seen it been integrated before so I don't know what happens to it. Why did it disappear?

The 1st order equation has me equally confused:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1_ip1.gif
integratin that, they get this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-3.gif
has does d[A]/[A] become ln[A]?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mycotheology said:
Heres the differential rate equation for a 0 order reaction in chemistry:
[itex]Rate = {{-d[A]} / {dt}} = k[/itex]
which can be rearranged to this:
[itex]-d[A] = dt k[/itex]
and when you integrate this you get the integrated rate equation but I don't understand how this works. The site I'm reading says you integrate both sides of the equation and get this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord_z5.gif
is that supposed to be a definite integral or something?

Any time there are limits of integration it is a definite integral.

Anyhow, after integrating they get this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord_z3.gif
I don't get it. Firstly [A] and t are variables so shouldn't they be raised a power and get divided by 2? In other words, shouldn't they become [itex][A]^{2} / 2[/itex] and [itex]t^{2} / 2[/itex]? Secondly, what's going on with the d. d means the change in something but I've never seen it been integrated before so I don't know what happens to it. Why did it disappear?

You need to remember back to your Calc I/II days. The d means an infitessimal change, you covered this when going over Riemann sums in Calc I. In more general terms, the d term let's you know for what term you are integrating with respect to. dx means you are integrating with respect to x and all other variables are held constant.

##\int x \ dx = \frac{x^2}{2} + C## because the variable you are integrating with respect you is x. However, ##\int y \ dx = xy + C## because y is held constant.

So, in this problem we have ##\displaystyle \int_{[A]_0}^{[A]} d[A] = -k \int_{t_o}^{t} dt## We are simply integrating the constant 1 in both of these equations, so the integral yields ##[A]## and t respectively, evaluated at the proper limits of integration.

##\displaystyle \int_{[A]_0}^{[A]} d[A] = -k \int_{t_o}^{t} dt## yields ##[A] - [A]_0 = -k (t - t_0)##. In these types of problems, ##t_0## is usually 0 so the equation simplifies to ##[A] = -kt + C##. I believe the + C term is the initial amount of the concentration of A, we never wrote it like this, we kept the ##[A]_0## term in the equation.

The 1st order equation has me equally confused:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1_ip1.gif
integratin that, they get this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-3.gif
has does d[A]/[A] become ln[A]?

Remember ##\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{x} dx = ln|x| + C##.
 
[tex]\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]} \frac{d[A]}{[A]}[/tex]
is just bad notation. Although it is, unfortunately, often done you should NOT use the same symbol for the "variable of integration" and the limits of integration. Better would be
[tex]\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]} \frac{dt}{t}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K