Understanding Lie Groups: A Simple Definition

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the definition and understanding of Lie groups, particularly focusing on the relationship between group operations and smooth manifolds. Participants explore the implications of the definition, the nature of smooth maps, and provide examples to clarify these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on what it means for a group operation to "induce" a smooth map and the significance of having a smooth map of a manifold into itself.
  • Another participant explains that a smooth map has partial derivatives of all orders and contrasts this with simple functions that may not be continuous.
  • It is noted that there are topological groups that are not manifolds and whose group multiplication is only continuous, suggesting a distinction between these and Lie groups.
  • A participant provides an intuitive explanation using the Lie group of unit complex numbers, illustrating how the group operation induces smooth paths within the manifold.
  • Another participant describes the function defined by the group operation and its continuity, emphasizing the smoothness of the inverse operation as well.
  • A participant presents an example of the group of rotations in 2-D, arguing that it can be continuously parameterized and thus qualifies as a Lie group, seeking verification from others.
  • A later reply confirms the correctness of the example and elaborates on the relationship between rotations and complex multiplication.
  • One participant reminds others that demonstrating the smoothness of the inverse operation is also necessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the nature of Lie groups and the smoothness of operations, but there is ongoing exploration of the definitions and implications. Some viewpoints are clarified while others remain open to further discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of smoothness and the definitions involved, indicating that further exploration of these concepts may be necessary.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in group theory, differential geometry, and the mathematical foundations of physics may find this discussion beneficial for understanding the interplay between group operations and manifold structures.

Matterwave
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,971
Reaction score
329
Hi, so I didn't see exactly where group theory stuff goes...but since Lie groups are also manifolds, then I guess I can ask this here? If there's a better section, please move it.

I just have a simple question regarding the definition of a Lie group. My book defines it as a group which is also a smooth manifold (e.g. its elements can be smoothly and continuously parameterized), and the group operation induces a smooth map of the manifold into itself.

I understand the first part of the definition, but I'm having trouble understanding the second half. What does it mean for a group operation to "induce" a map, and what exactly does it mean to have a smooth map of a manifold into itself? I mean I can picture a map which maps a manifold into itself, like a map from R->R (a simple function f(x) should do the trick right), but why impose that restriction? My book says something about making the group structure compatible with the structure of a manifold, but I didn't quite understand that either. Some help would be nice, thanks. =]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Matterwave said:
Hi, so I didn't see exactly where group theory stuff goes...but since Lie groups are also manifolds, then I guess I can ask this here? If there's a better section, please move it.

I just have a simple question regarding the definition of a Lie group. My book defines it as a group which is also a smooth manifold (e.g. its elements can be smoothly and continuously parameterized), and the group operation induces a smooth map of the manifold into itself.

I understand the first part of the definition, but I'm having trouble understanding the second half. What does it mean for a group operation to "induce" a map, and what exactly does it mean to have a smooth map of a manifold into itself? I mean I can picture a map which maps a manifold into itself, like a map from R->R (a simple function f(x) should do the trick right), but why impose that restriction? My book says something about making the group structure compatible with the structure of a manifold, but I didn't quite understand that either. Some help would be nice, thanks. =]

- A smooth map has partial derivatives of all orders. A simple function, f(x), may not even be continuous.

- There are topological groups that are not manifolds and whose group multiplication is only continuous.

- In a Lie group, the smoothness of the group multiplication implies rich mathematical structure.

- Lie groups appear naturally in many areas of mathematics and physics - e.g. differential geometry, quantum mechanics.
 
Here is an intuitive explanation of what it means where I will try to appear to visual intuition. Let G denote the Lie group of unit complex numbers under multiplication, and pick two elements g and h from it, and let U be a small neighborhood of h and consider the image g(U). We note that gh is an element in g(U). Pick another element h' in U, and imagine slowly varying gh to gh'. This will trace out a smooth path in g(U) - it is precisely this smoothness that is meant by a smooth map induced by the group operation onto itself. Technically, this means it is infinitely differentiable.

Now the actual map induced by the group operation on G is defined by picking any g in G and then looking at the image g(G), i.e., replace all elements h with gh. What this would correspond to on our example is simply rotations of the unit complex circle. Do you see why this is true?
 
the group operation induces a smooth map of the manifold into itself.
For any element a in the group, the function f_a G-> G defined by f_a(x)= a*x (where * is the group operation) is a continuous function.

From that one can show that the map from GxG to G given by (a, b)-> a*b (where * is the group operation) is a continuous function and the map from G to G given by a-> a^{-1} is continuous.
 
Ok, I think I got it. Just to make sure I got it right, can you guys verify that my example below is correct? I work well with concrete examples.

Suppose I take the group of all rotations about the origin in 2-D. I can continuously parameterize this group by the angle theta through which I rotate, and therefore this group is mappable to an open set in R, and is therefore a manifold.
Next, if I pick out an element from the group, I will call it "a" - a rotation around angle pi/2, then for "b" a rotation around angle theta, a*b=rotation around angle theta+pi/2. If I vary my parameter theta smoothly (varying "b" continuously), then I obviously get the total rotation a*b which varies smoothly. Therefore, I conclude that the group of all rotations in a 2-D plane about the origin is a Lie Group.

This is correct?
 
Matterwave said:
Ok, I think I got it. Just to make sure I got it right, can you guys verify that my example below is correct? I work well with concrete examples.

Suppose I take the group of all rotations about the origin in 2-D. I can continuously parameterize this group by the angle theta through which I rotate, and therefore this group is mappable to an open set in R, and is therefore a manifold.
Next, if I pick out an element from the group, I will call it "a" - a rotation around angle pi/2, then for "b" a rotation around angle theta, a*b=rotation around angle theta+pi/2. If I vary my parameter theta smoothly (varying "b" continuously), then I obviously get the total rotation a*b which varies smoothly. Therefore, I conclude that the group of all rotations in a 2-D plane about the origin is a Lie Group.

This is correct?

This is indeed correct. Note that the elements of your manifold are \phi_\theta(x)=e^{ix}. In fact, we have a diffeomorphism that does

Rotations\rightarrow \text{Sphere in}~\mathbb{C}:~\phi_\theta\rightarrow e^{i\theta}.

The group operation on the rotations then correspond to the multiplication in the complex numbers. Since this multiplication is smooth, it follows that your group operation is also smooth...
 
Also, if I'm not mistakesn you'll have to show that taking the inverse is smooth...
 
baby steps! haha, ok thanks =D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K