Understanding Limits with Two Path Tests

  • Thread starter Thread starter yecko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Path
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of the two-path test in evaluating limits of multivariable functions. Participants question how to identify when a limit may not exist and the rationale behind selecting specific paths like y=0 and y=-x^2. It is noted that even if both the numerator and denominator approach zero, they may do so at different rates, affecting the limit's outcome. The use of L'Hôpital's rule and polar coordinates is suggested as methods to analyze the limits more effectively. Understanding the behavior of functions along different paths is crucial for determining the existence of limits in multivariable calculus.
yecko
Gold Member
Messages
275
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Wx0tkw8.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Wx0tkw8.jpg
(example 3b)

Homework Equations


limit of multivariable equation
Two path test

The Attempt at a Solution


My instructor told us that we should only use two paths test only if we predict there isn't any limit... but how can we 'sense' there aren't limit?? (take e.g. 3b...)
moreover, where are the two paths come from? (I don't feel like y=0 and y=-x^2 have any connection to the required function...)

any help would be appreciated~~~
thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In 3b, the x and y have different powers inside the sin(). Everything else is the same for them. So you can suspect that the limits for the path y≡0, x→0 and the path x≡0, y→0, may be different.

Picking the path where y = -x2 is clever. It makes the numerator always 0 on that path, so that limit on that path is 0.
 
FactChecker said:
Everything else is the same for them
What does it imply for everything the same??
(indeed y is to power 1 in numerator and denominator y is to power 2...)
FactChecker said:
y≡0, x→0 and the path x≡0, y→0
as they are both tends to 0, why are they may be different??

Thank you!
 
yecko said:
What does it imply for everything the same??
If there is one significant difference and everything else is identical, you can more easily determine what the effect of that one difference will be.
as they are both tends to 0, why are they may be different??
That is not true. Even though both numerator and denominator go to 0, they go to zero at different rates. The limits will depend on the rates. I don't know what techniques you have to analyse that. If you know the "small angle approximation", you can use that here.
 
  • Like
Likes yecko
FactChecker said:
Even though both numerator and denominator go to 0, they go to zero at different rates
oh! I get it! use l'hospitals rule, right?
yecko said:
moreover, where are the two paths come from? (I don't feel like y=0 and y=-x^2 have any connection to the required function...)
I am still doubting where y=-x^2 comes from... or it is just any random functions do?

thanks
 
yecko said:
oh! I get it! use l'hospitals rule, right?
Yes. That will work. Or you can use the small angle approximation sin(θ) ≈ θ if θ ≈ 0.
I am still doubting where y=-x^2 comes from... or it is just any random functions do?
It makes x2 + y ≡ 0 on that path. So the numerator is 0 on that path.
 
One thing to note. Sine function is odd, while a parabola is even. But sine of x^2 is going to be even, since its argument is always positive. You could use that knowledge to help predict that it may not work from 2 different paths. Set y = 0 then consider x -> 0. Then do the same with x=0 and y->0. How do they differ?
 
yecko said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 211935
https://i.imgur.com/Wx0tkw8.jpg
(example 3b)

Homework Equations


limit of multivariable equation
Two path test

The Attempt at a Solution


My instructor told us that we should only use two paths test only if we predict there isn't any limit... but how can we 'sense' there aren't limit?? (take e.g. 3b...)
moreover, where are the two paths come from? (I don't feel like y=0 and y=-x^2 have any connection to the required function...)

any help would be appreciated~~~
thank you very much!

For question (b), change to polar coordinates ##x = r \cos \theta## and ##y = r \sin \theta##.
 
yecko said:
My instructor told us that we should only use two paths test only if we predict there isn't any limit... but how can we 'sense' there aren't limit?? (take e.g. 3b.
My guess is that your instructor means this:
To prove it does not converge to the same value on all paths, you should try to find two paths with different limits; to prove it does converge on all paths you need to use a more comprehensive approach - no matter how many specific paths you test you will still not have proved it.
At first, you may not know which is true, so be prepared to alternate. If the limit is the same on a few interesting looking paths then try to prove the general result; when that fails, try to understand why it eludes you, as that can give the clue as to what pathological path to try.
 
  • #10
To be suspicious of there not being a limit, consider any point where the denominator becomes 0. If the numerator and/or denominator approaches 0 at different rates depending on the path (proportional to different powers of the variables), then you should look hard at that.
 
  • #11
FactChecker said:
To be suspicious of there not being a limit, consider any point where the denominator becomes 0. If the numerator and/or denominator approaches 0 at different rates depending on the path (proportional to different powers of the variables), then you should look hard at that.

The suggestion in #8 will show immediately what is happening.
 
  • #12
Thank you very much for all your replies!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K