A Understanding Mu Pileup Profile in Analysis Papers

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Papers
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
A simple question, what kind (of important) information can someone extract by reading the pileup profile (average mu) of the data in an analysis paper?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It should not be important for the result. Pileup collisions are background, if the experiments did their analysis properly the result does not depend on background.

Within the analysis it is important for various things, dependent on what the analysis is about. All efficiencies, fake rates, many background components and so on are pileup-dependent.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top