Estimating decay yields from fits to these distributions

In summary, the conversation discusses the methodology for measuring ratios in rare B-decays, specifically the use of an unbinned extended maximum-likelihood fit to determine the ratio. The fit takes into account the correlation between selection efficiencies and different data-taking periods, with the resonant decay mode yields being used as constraints. The question asks how the yields are extracted from the fit, and it is explained that the non-resonant yield and ratio are free parameters in the fit function. The fit determines the optimal values and uncertainties for these parameters. The conversation also mentions the use of different functions to model background contributions in the mass distribution, with the signal yield being the number of events falling under the signal shape in the fit model.
  • #1
Floyd_13
10
3
I'm currently reading various papers on the violation of Lepton Flavour Universality in rare B-decays and I would appreciate some help in understanding the methodology for measuring the ratios in these decays.

Here is a quote from a recent paper from the LHCb collaboration (p.5):

An unbinned extended maximum-likelihood fit to the m(K+e+e) and m(K+µ+µ) distributions of nonresonant candidates is used to determine RK [the ratio]. In order to take into account the correlation between the selection efficiencies, the different trigger categories and data-taking periods are fitted simultaneously. The resonant decay mode yields are incorporated as constraints in this fit, such that the B+→K+µ+µ- yield and RK are fit parameters.

My question is how exactly are the yields extracted from the fits performed on the mass data points using maximum likelihood estimations? Does this mean that the fitted function has to be a function of the yield N? If yes, how is this achieved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For details you would have to ask the people doing the analysis, but the non-resonant yield and the ratio are free parameters in the fit function. The fit then determines the optimal values and their uncertainties.
 
  • #3
Plotting the invariant mass of the final state particles gives a mass distribution of the B meson. In this distribution, the events are not only real B meson decays but they could come from different sources of background. Almost always you will have combinatorial background and, as it is the case in the analysis you are referring to, partially reconstructed background (see Fig 2, top-left). Some functions/shapes are then used to model these several contributions that add up to the observed mass distribution. For example, combinatorial background is usually fitted only with an exponential function, while the (non-resonant, i.e. non-Jpsi mode) signal is fitted probably with a Gaussian with exponential tails (DSCB).

What they mean by (signal) yield is actually the number of events in the initial mass distribution that fall under the signal shape in their fit model. The yield along with its uncertainty are determined by the fit.
 
  • Like
Likes Floyd_13

1. What is the purpose of estimating decay yields from fits to these distributions?

The purpose of estimating decay yields from fits to these distributions is to determine the amount of decay or breakdown of a substance over time. This can provide valuable information for understanding the properties and behavior of the substance, as well as potential applications in various fields such as medicine, environmental science, and engineering.

2. How are decay yields estimated from fits to distributions?

Decay yields are estimated by fitting a mathematical model to experimental data, such as a decay curve or histogram. The model takes into account factors such as the initial amount of the substance, the rate of decay, and any other relevant variables. By comparing the model to the data, the decay yield can be estimated with a certain level of confidence.

3. What types of distributions are commonly used for estimating decay yields?

There are several types of distributions that are commonly used for estimating decay yields, including exponential, Gaussian, and Poisson distributions. Each of these has its own unique properties and may be more appropriate for certain types of data. It is important to carefully consider the type of distribution used for a particular analysis to ensure accurate results.

4. What are some potential sources of error in estimating decay yields from fits to distributions?

There are several potential sources of error in estimating decay yields from fits to distributions. These include experimental errors, such as measurement uncertainties or fluctuations in the data, as well as assumptions made in the mathematical model. It is important to carefully consider and account for these potential sources of error in order to obtain accurate estimates of decay yields.

5. How can the accuracy of estimated decay yields be improved?

The accuracy of estimated decay yields can be improved by using more precise and reliable experimental techniques, as well as carefully selecting and validating the mathematical model used for fitting the data. Additionally, conducting multiple trials and averaging the results can help to reduce the impact of random errors. It is also important to critically evaluate and account for any potential sources of error in the analysis.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
49
Views
9K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
923
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
961
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
759
Back
Top