Understanding No Energy Degeneracy in Sakurai's Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of energy degeneracy in quantum mechanics as presented in Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" (3rd edition). Specifically, it clarifies that for a given angular momentum quantum number ##l## in a free particle within an infinite spherical well, there are no degeneracies in ##l## values, contrasting with the isotropic harmonic oscillator where degeneracies exist. The confusion arises from the distinction between degeneracies related to the magnetic quantum number ##m## and those associated with ##l##. The text emphasizes that degeneracies in ##l## indicate additional symmetries, such as SO(4) for the hydrogen atom and SU(3) for the 3D harmonic oscillator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly angular momentum.
  • Familiarity with spherical Bessel functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of energy eigenvalues in quantum systems.
  • Basic concepts of symmetry in quantum mechanics, including SO(4) and SU(3) symmetries.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of spherical Bessel functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of degeneracy in quantum systems, focusing on angular momentum.
  • Learn about the symmetries of the hydrogen atom and their implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the differences between energy levels in various quantum systems, such as the infinite spherical well and isotropic harmonic oscillator.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists exploring angular momentum and symmetry, and educators seeking to clarify concepts of energy degeneracy in quantum systems.

euphoricrhino
Messages
23
Reaction score
14
Hello, I'm hoping someone can help me understand a statement in Sakurai Modern Quantum Mechanics (3rd edition).
In particular, in the section that describes free particle in infinite spherical well (page 198, section 3.7.2), after the text has shown that for a given ##l## value, the energy eigenvalues correspond to the nodes of spherical Bessel functions, the last paragraph went on and said

"It should be noted that this series of energy levels shows no degeneracies in ##l##. Indeed, such degenerate energy levels are impossible, except for any accidental equality between zeros of spherical Bessel functions of different order."

How can there be no energy degeneracy for a given ##l##? Don't all the ##m## state for the same ##l## count as degeneracies?

If I understand this statement as specifically referring to the radial part of the wave function (hence ##m## degeneracies are not in scope), the next few pages (pp201) discussed degeneracies of isotropic oscillator, where the text stated

"Quite unlike the square well, the three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator has degenerate energy eigenvalues in the ##l## quantum number. There are three states (all ##l=1##) for ##N=1##. For ##N=2## there are five states with ##l=2##, plus one state with ##q=1## and ##l=0##..."
where clearly the ##m## states are counted as degeneracies here.

Any insightful explanations are greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After some thoughts, I think I misunderstood the statement. Degeneracy in ##l## means two different ##l## values ending up at the same energy eigenvalue. So the two cases are indeed what the text claims to be :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and vanhees71
I think the latter is what Sakurai means. The degeneracy wrt. the "magnetic quantum number" ##m## is valid for all radially symmetric potentials due to rotation invariance of the problem. Degeneracy wrt. to the angular-momentum quantum number ##\ell## is special and indicates additional symmetries. E.g., for the non-relativistic Coulomb problem (hydrogen atom) it's an SO(4) symmetry. For the 3D harmonic symmetric oscillator it's SU(3).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: euphoricrhino, dextercioby and topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K