Understanding Planetary Spheres: The Role of Gravitational Compression

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jldibble
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Spheres
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons why planets tend to form into spherical shapes, focusing on the role of gravitational forces and other contributing factors. Participants explore concepts related to planetary formation, gravitational compression, and the effects of rotation on shape.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that gravity is the primary reason for the spherical shape of planets, as it allows for maximum volume with minimal surface area.
  • Another participant explains that planets form through accretion, where small particles clump together, and gravity ultimately shapes them into spheres.
  • A participant seeks a specific technical term related to gravitational processes affecting planetary shape, suggesting it might be a three-word phrase.
  • Isostatic adjustment is proposed as a possible term related to the discussion.
  • Some participants highlight that not all celestial bodies are perfect spheres, citing Jupiter's oblateness and the irregular shape of Haumea as examples.
  • There is mention of an equation that quantifies how much an object deviates from being a true sphere, although one participant cannot recall it.
  • Another participant discusses how the minimization of surface area is crucial for planet formation, particularly in environments with ice particles, as it affects the accretion process.
  • Gravitational compression is emphasized as a significant factor for bodies larger than a few tens of kilometers in radius.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the role of gravity in shaping planets, but there are multiple views regarding the specifics of how rotation affects shape and the implications for different celestial bodies. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact terminology and the nuances of planetary shapes.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors influencing planetary shape, including gravitational compression and rotation, but do not resolve the complexities or dependencies of these factors. The discussion also touches on the limitations of understanding shapes beyond perfect spheres.

jldibble
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Why planets are "spheres"

I was reading the specifics on why large bodies in space, such as planets, are pulled into spherical shape and they had a very technical term for the process.

Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Gravity is the short answer. A sphere produces maximum volume with the least possible surface area. A planet forms via accretion. Small particles clump together, most likely by electrostatic attraction. As the clump grows gravity takes charge. Gravity is an equal opportunity employer and each particle attracted tries to get as close to the center of gravity as possible. This forces the planet to become spherical over time. The high spots eventually migrate into the lowest available spots. A certain amount of oblateness is present in all planets due to centrifugal force.
 
I understand the forces at work when it comes to the shape. I'm just trying to track down the term that was used that I can't seem to find.

I believe term was three words and was something along the lines of "gravitational ____________ __________"

I apologize that I can't be more descriptive on what I'm looking for.
 
That's it! Thanks
 
They aren't all spheres. Jupiter is significantly wider at the equator than pole to pole. Look at Haumea, a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt. It has a highly ecliptic shape!
 
I know there's an equation to find out how much an object shifts from being a true sphere. I forgot it though :(
 
Well, Jupiter would be a sphere but the force of its rotation causes the oblateness. That's going to be true of any rotating sphere, even a relatively solid one such as the earth.
 
In addition, the fact that a spherical shape minimizes surface area is key when it comes to understanding planet formation. Planets are more easily formed when there are a bunch of ice particles floating around (they accrete material more easily), so minimizing surface area minimizes exposure to sunlight, which minimizes the amount of ice that gets melted, which makes it easier for the planet to from. But yeah, gravitational compression is going to be the main cause for anything larger than a few tens of kilometers in radius.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K