What is the significance of Planck Length in understanding the fabric of space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter michojek
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The Planck Length, approximately 10^-35 meters, is derived from fundamental constants and represents a theoretical scale where quantum gravity effects may become significant. It is not a definitive rule that dictates the structure of space, but rather a conceptual framework for understanding the limits of measurement in physics. While some physicists consider it the smallest unit of length, others remain skeptical about its implications for the nature of space. Atoms are significantly larger than the Planck Length, indicating that no atom can exist between these distances. The discussion highlights the distinction between Planck Length and Planck's constant, clarifying their roles in theoretical physics.
michojek
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was just reading upon plank's constant and it was theoretically the 'smallest measurement' possible.

Does that mean that space itself follows this rule?
For example, you can't have an atom 'between' a plank distance..(like a grid where you can only have positions in the intersections of those lines)

So the smallest distance an object can you is a plank a time?

I'm just not sure if I have the right notion of plank length..

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
michojek said:
Hello, I was just reading upon plank's constant and it was theoretically the 'smallest measurement' possible.

Does that mean that space itself follows this rule?

Its not a rule, its a theoretical figure, 10^-35 meters, derived from fundamental constants of nature, such as the speed of light, c, Newton's gravitational constant, G, and Plancks constant, h. Some theoretical physicists truly believe its the fundamentally smallest unit of length, others are not so sure.

For example, you can't have an atom 'between' a plank distance..(like a grid where you can only have positions in the intersections of those lines)

Considering that an atom is many order of magnitude larger than the Planck length, as in perhaps 25, then, yes, you cannot have an atom between a Planck distance. However, that does not mean that there may be something, such as quantum "space-time foam," etc. that may do so.

So the smallest distance an object can you is a plank a time
?

I'm not sure what that sentence is supposed to mean, but there is indeed a Planck time, which has been derived similarly to the Planck length, and that figure is 10^-43 seconds.
 
michojek said:
Hello, I was just reading upon plank's constant and it was theoretically the 'smallest measurement' possible.
You mean the Planck Length. Planck's constant is something else entirely.

The Planck Length, √(ħG/c3) is a length scale, not a precise value. It's roughly the distance at which the effects of quantum gravity are expected to become important. There is no implication that it's the "smallest" distance, or that space becomes a discrete lattice at that scale.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
635
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K