Understanding Polynomial Functions: Analyzing h(x) = 3x + 2x

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the classification of the function h(x) = 3x + 2x and whether it qualifies as a polynomial function. Participants explore the nature of linear functions and their relationship to polynomial functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the definition of polynomial functions and whether linear functions, such as h(x), fit that definition. There is discussion about the degree of the function and the terminology used to describe it, including terms like monomial and polynomial.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing differing perspectives on the classification of linear functions and the terminology used. Some guidance has been offered regarding the classification of functions, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a potential discrepancy in terminology based on different algebra resources, which may affect how participants interpret the classification of functions. Additionally, there are unrelated questions about graph transformations that have been raised, indicating a broader range of topics being discussed.

Nelo
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Why is this not a polynomial function? h(x) = 3x + 2x

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



3x+2x = 5x.

5x is a linear function with a degree of 1, why is this not a polynomial funct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already said it has a degree of one and is linear right?

What is it called when the term has one degree?
 
so.. linear functions are not polynomial functions but quadratic functions of x^2 are ?
 
An Algebra book I've seen recently would classify that as a polynomial, as well as being a monomial IF you see that you can combine the terms: 3x+2x=5x. Yes, 5x would still be a polynomial (but I would not want to call it that. I would rather just call it a monomial).
 
Quick question.

Describe transformation to graph x^4 :: 5f[2/5(x-3)] +1

so.. vertical 5, horizontal 2/5 (in the book it says 5/2... ? is that how it is?) right 3 up 1.

Is the horizontal 2/5 or 5/2 ? why flip it if its outside the x already?\

Or do you always state the recipricol of it?
 
Nelo said:
Quick question.

Describe transformation to graph x^4 :: 5f[2/5(x-3)] +1

so.. vertical 5, horizontal 2/5 (in the book it says 5/2... ? is that how it is?) right 3 up 1.

Is the horizontal 2/5 or 5/2 ? why flip it if its outside the x already?\

Or do you always state the recipricol of it?
For new questions, you really should start a new thread.

Assuming f(x) = x4, the graph you're asking about is y = 5f( 2/5 *(x - 3)] + 1.

If you know the graph of y = g(x), the graph of y = g(3x) represents a compression toward the y-axis by a factor of 1/3 of the graph of g. So for example, if (6, 2) is a point on the graph of g, then (2, 2) will be on the graph of y = g(3x).

The graph of y = 2g(x) represents a stretch away from the x-axis by a factor of 2.

Can you apply these ideas to your problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K