Understanding Quantum Numbers and Their Limits in Particle States

  • Thread starter Thread starter UndeniablyRex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
UndeniablyRex
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Correct me where I go wrong.

I understand two particles can not share the same quantum numbers, but electrons in separate atoms do share the same quantum numbers. Where's the limit? How far away from a particle do you have to be in order to be able to consider that state "empty"?

Thank you for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UndeniablyRex said:
Correct me where I go wrong.

I understand two particles can not share the same quantum numbers, but electrons in separate atoms do share the same quantum numbers. Where's the limit? How far away from a particle do you have to be in order to be able to consider that state "empty"?

Thank you for any help

No, not really, electrons associated with different atoms have different quantum numbers, the thing is, position is not a good quantum number to use, since the state of the electron is in general, not localised, so it does not have a definite position.

So it is not really about 'how far away', but rather, more about finding the right quantum numbers to define the state of the system. So for example, if the angular momentum and spins of the electron states are well defined, then you should use those numbers for comparison, not the position
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top