Understanding Quantum Purification

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the concept of quantum purification, specifically the mathematical representation of a purification of a density matrix ρA. The purification is defined as lψ>AB, where TrB[lψ><ψlAB] = ρA. The discussion highlights the correct procedure for performing purification, which includes eigendecomposition of the density matrix and the introduction of a secondary pure state. The final density matrix after purification is expressed as ρpure = ∑∑√p_i√p_j|i⟩|vi⟩⟨j|⟨j|, ensuring that tracing over the secondary state recovers the original density matrix.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of density matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with tensor products in quantum states
  • Knowledge of eigendecomposition and eigenvalues/eigenvectors
  • Basic principles of quantum state purification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of eigendecomposition of density matrices
  • Learn about tensor products and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of quantum state purification in detail
  • Review the Wikipedia page on quantum purification for additional examples
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in quantum information theory will benefit from this discussion.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I am not very good at this, but I really want to understand it.

Definition:
We say lψ>AB is a purification of ρA if TrB[lψ><ψlAB ] = ρA.

Note that ρA is a density matrix.

My book proceeds to give an example of a purifying system as:

√ρA ⊗ 1*lΦ>, where 1 is identity and lΦ> = ∑ilii> = ∑ili>⊗li>

How can I see that this is true? I am not sure I even know how to perform the tensor product on the LHS. Is this correct?
√ρA ⊗ 1*lΦ> = √ρA ⊗ (∑ili>⊗li>) = (∑i√ρAli>⊗√ρAli>)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's definitely not correct. The matrix sizes of the left-hand and right-hand sizes can't possibly match up because you took ##\rho_A## and suddenly put it on both sides of the tensor product. I think you're confused about what your book is doing. The starting expression ##\sqrt{\rho_A} \otimes \left| \Phi \right\rangle## already makes no sense in context. Like... it's tensor-producting a matrix against a column-vector.

To do a purification on paper you generally:

- Perform an eigendecomposition of the density matrix ##\rho##, giving you ##\rho = \sum p_i \left| v_i \right\rangle \left\langle v_i \right|## where each ##p_i## is a probability and each ##\left| v_i \right\rangle## is some pure state (the ##p_i##'s are the eigenvalues and the ##\left| v_i \right\rangle##'s are the eigenvectors).
- Introduce a secondary pure state which has a state for each eigenvector and amplitudes that give probabilities that will match the eigenvalues. Perhaps ##\sum \sqrt{p_i} \left| i \right\rangle##.
- Match the secondary pure state's components against the density matrix' eigenvectors, inside the sum. ##\psi_{pure} = \sum \sqrt{p_i} \left| i \right\rangle \left| v_i \right\rangle##.
- The new overall density matrix is ##\rho_{pure} = \sum \sum \sqrt {p_i} \sqrt{p_j} \left| i \right\rangle \left| v_i \right\rangle \left\langle v_j \right| \left\langle j \right|##, and tracing over the introduced secondary state's space will result in the original density matrix.

This is exactly what the wikipedia page on quantum purification does.
 
Last edited:
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K