Understanding Relativity: Solving Homework Questions for Non-Science Majors

  • Thread starter Thread starter doriori
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving homework questions related to special relativity for non-science majors in a Quantum Engima class at UCSC. The user correctly calculates distances for Mary and Joe using the equation x=rt, concluding that their calculations are accurate in their respective reference frames. However, the user expresses uncertainty regarding the implications of the hint v< PREREQUISITES

  • Basic understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the equation x=rt for distance calculation
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz factor, γ (gamma)
  • Understanding of reference frames in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Lorentz contraction in special relativity
  • Learn how to apply the Lorentz transformation equations
  • Explore the concept of simultaneity in different reference frames
  • Investigate the effects of traveling at relativistic speeds on time and distance measurements
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for non-science majors studying physics, educators teaching special relativity concepts, and anyone seeking to understand the practical applications of relativistic physics in problem-solving scenarios.

doriori
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Contraction of length and time: non-science major needs help!

Hey guys, I am in a class on the Quantum Engima @ UCSC. This is a physics class for non-science majors, so being a non-science major I am having a bit of trouble. Right now we're in a special relativity chapter and THIS is on my homework:
4. a) Mary drives from Santa Cruz to Watsonville @ 50mph. Her accurate watch tells her that 1/2 hour has passed during her trip. She calculates the distance (in her reference frame) between two cities. What is the distance she calculates, is she correct? (Hint: since her v<<c her reference frame is for all practical purposes the same as the ground frame)
For this, I just did the simple equation x=rt, 50x1/2=25 miles and I said that in her reference frame, she is correct. However, my teacher isn't one to give us such easy equations and I feel like I need to be using a more relevant equation..
b. Joe drives from Santa Cruz to Watsonville at 50 mph. His INaccurate watch tells him that 1/4 hour has passed during his trip. He calculates the distances between two cities. What is the distance he calculates? Is he correct? (Hint: since his v<<c his reference frame is for all practical purposes the same as the ground frame)
Same here. Did 50x 1/4= 12.5. And concluded that his mileage calculated is incorrect. Again, I'm suspicious. Why did my teacher tell me v<<c?
c. Alien Ig on a fast rocket zips from Santa Cruz to Watsonville at .9 C. Ig's clocks are accurate. Ig calculates the distance between the two cities. What distance does Ig calculate, is Ig correct? (Graph in text can avoid arithmetic) (Hint: t=[tex]\gamma[/tex]t'
Here I did the equation l=l'/[tex]\gamma[/tex] and got 10.77 miles, and that he is correct for his reference frame. However, I don't understand how I could have conceivably avoided arithmetic??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
4a and 4b really are that simple, they are just setting you up for the relativistic part 4c.

Sorry it's been too long since I did relativity to help with c, but I'm sure others can chime in here. But now you know at least 2/3 are correct :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K