Undergrad Understanding Spherical Tensors & Their Applications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spherical Tensors
Click For Summary
Spherical tensors, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics, can be formed by combining different angular momentum ranks, such as rank 1 tensors like Pauli matrices and rank 1/2 tensors. The discussion highlights how combining these tensors can yield new tensors, including rank 3/2 tensors, using Clebsch-Jordan symbols. The physical interpretation of these combinations suggests that manipulating the spin states can alter the identity of the particle, transitioning from a spin 1/2 to a spin 3/2 state. This raises questions about the implications of such transformations in quantum systems. Understanding these tensor operations is crucial for grasping their applications in quantum mechanics.
Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! I came across spherical tensors, and I am a bit confused about the way they are applied. For example, Pauli matrices, can be grouped together to form a rank 1 (vector) spherical tensor as ##(\sigma_-, \sigma_z, \sigma_+)##, which are the raising operator, the z projection operator and the lowering operator. When this acts on a spin state, say ##(1/2,1/2)##, we can think of it as normal angular momentum addition. For example, for ##\sigma_-##, which is, as a tensor, ##(1,-1)##, we would get overall ##(1/2,-1/2)## i.e. the spin down state, which is what you expect. The same applies for the other 2 operators. This makes sense. However, combining a rank 1 tensor with a rank 1/2 tensor would give both a rank 1/2 tensor, which is what I mentioned before i.e. the down state is still part of a rank 1/2, but it should also give a rank 3/2 tensor. What is the mathematical expression and physical meaning of this 3/2 rank tensor? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, in your example you have one tensor ##S## of angular momentum (rank) ##j_1=1/2## and another one ##D## with ##j_2 = 1##. You can form the new tensors (using Clebsch-Jordan symbols)

$$T_{J=1/2, M} = \sum_{m_1 m_2} (1/2 m_1 1 m_2 | 1/2 M) S_{1/2, m_1}D_{1, m_2}$$,

and

$$T_{J=3/2, M} = \sum_{m_1 m_2} (1/2 m_1 1 m_2 | 3/2 M) S_{1/2, m_1}D_{1, m_2}$$,

where ##(1/2 m_1 1 m_2 | 3/2 M)## is a Clebsch-Jordan symbol.

The only example of spherical tensors of non-integer rank which I can think of are creation and annihilation operators.
 
eys_physics said:
So, in your example you have one tensor ##S## of angular momentum (rank) ##j_1=1/2## and another one ##D## with ##j_2 = 1##. You can form the new tensors (using Clebsch-Jordan symbols)

$$T_{J=1/2, M} = \sum_{m_1 m_2} (1/2 m_1 1 m_2 | 1/2 M) S_{1/2, m_1}D_{1, m_2}$$,

and

$$T_{J=3/2, M} = \sum_{m_1 m_2} (1/2 m_1 1 m_2 | 3/2 M) S_{1/2, m_1}D_{1, m_2}$$,

where ##(1/2 m_1 1 m_2 | 3/2 M)## is a Clebsch-Jordan symbol.

The only example of spherical tensors of non-integer rank which I can think of are creation and annihilation operators.
Thank you for your reply. So in the first case, I understand the meaning of the expression from a physical point of view, in terms of quantum mechanics. For example, for ##M=1/2##, it says that you can get that either by applying ##\sigma_z = \sigma_0## on the state ##(1/2,1/2)## or applying ##\sigma_+## on ##(1/2,-1/2)##. I.e. you have the same particle, of spin ##1/2## (say an electron), but you can change its spin orientation. I am not sure what is the physical meaning in the second case. It looks like you start with a particle of spin ##1/2## and end up with a particle of spin ##3/2## (and some direction of the spin on the z axis). So you basically change the identity of the particle. What is the physical meaning of this?
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K