MHB Understanding Squaring the Bottom of an Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrus
  • Start date Start date
Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB,
I have problem understanding the last part, why do they square the bottom?
j5b5z9.png


Is it because we got -2? if we would have -3 would we take the bottom $$(bottom)^3$$?
I am aware that $$\ln|f(x)|- \ln|g(x)|= \ln\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Petrus said:
Hello MHB,
I have problem understanding the last part, why do they square the bottom?
j5b5z9.png


Is it because we got -2? if we would have -3 would we take the bottom $$(bottom)^3$$?
I am aware that $$\ln|f(x)|- \ln|g(x)|= \ln\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$

Simply is...

$$- 2\ \ln |x+\frac{1}{2}| = \ln \frac{1}{|x+\frac{1}{2}|^{2}} = \ln \frac{1}{(x+\frac{1}{2})^{2}}$$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
Simply is...

$$- 2\ \ln |x+\frac{1}{2}| = \ln \frac{1}{|x+\frac{1}{2}|^{2}} = \ln \frac{1}{(x+\frac{1}{2})^{2}}$$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
Ohh now I see. We use this rule.
ea0d010db0bb2795fe2a83ea998cbd9c.png

right?

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Petrus said:
Ohh now I see. We use this rule.
ea0d010db0bb2795fe2a83ea998cbd9c.png

right?

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$

Right.

It also uses the exponent law $a^{-b} = \dfrac{1}{a^b}$
 
Thanks for the fast responed and help from you both!:)Now I understand!:)

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top