I Understanding tension and centripedal force in a puck and weight

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the mechanics of tension and centripetal force in a system involving a puck and a weight. The net force equations reveal that tension is crucial for maintaining the puck's circular motion, as it provides the necessary centripetal acceleration. The tension in the rope acts inward on the puck while simultaneously exerting an upward force on the weight, creating a complex interaction. The participants clarify that tension in a rope does not have a single directional force but acts in both directions at once, affecting both the puck and the weight. This exploration reinforces the importance of accurately visualizing force interactions in physics problems.
ago01
Messages
46
Reaction score
8
For practice I did the following problem:

1646538635747.png


Solving this problem mechanically was simple enough using the following force diagrams:

1646539166892.png
Then

$$F_{net_M} = T - Mg = 0$$

Due to the stationary condition

$$T = mg$$

and

$$F_{net_m} = T = ma_c$$

$$T = ma_c$$

Because centripedal acceleration is inward the direction of the tension. The rope is pulling on the puck to stay in the circle, because without it the puck would simply fly away.

So we find after substitution:

$$Mg = m\frac{v^2}{R}$$

and after some algebra

$$v = 1.8 \frac{m}{s}$$.So algebraically this problem wasn't terrible. Understanding the nature of the forces wasn't too bad either...at least mechanically. However I'm left wondering how exactly this tension is behaving.

Since the the rope is pulling inward on the puck it is imposing some centripedal force on the puck, and this force is causing the centripedal acceleration experienced (and what is holding the puck on the radius).

However, the rope is also pulling up on the weight. So the tension in the rope is inward facing (towards the hanging weight), yet the weight experiences some upward tension to balance out gravitational force as well! My intuition is failing me.

Is this because of the right angle it is creating? The tension is inward on the table, but upward on the weight opposite gravity. Does this have something to do with the angle it's creating? If gravity and centripedal acceleration are both inward (gravity being "down and in") I would expect the rope to be slack. I'm trying to quantify this but I am failing at coming up with a way to explain it. Which bothers me because I've seen the experiment done before.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ago01 said:
So the tension in the rope is inward facing
Can you clarify what you mean when you say that tension in a rope has a direction toward one end and away from the other?

Hint: It does not.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Can you clarify what you mean when you say that tension in a rope has a direction toward one end and away from the other?

Hint: It does not.

Sure, I'll diagram what's going on in my brain

1646541222941.png


This was my original post diagrammed. However, it appears I forgot a very important condition...

1646541496166.png


I'm not sure if this is totally correct...but it feels closer. So because the puck is spinning a circle, the changing velocity is generating a centripedal acceleration. This centripedal acceleration is the inward tension. But, the puck is also "pulling back" on the weight by being held along the radius by this acceleration.
 
Right. The tension in the cord works both ways.

It pulls left on the corner of the hole in the table. It pulls right on the puck.
It pulls down on the corner of the hole in the table. It pulls up on the weight.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Right. The tension in the cord works both ways.

It pulls left on the corner of the hole in the table. It pulls right on the puck.
It pulls down on the corner of the hole in the table. It pulls up on the weight.

I see yep. I'm glad I asked. This is a good checkpoint for me on making sure I'm getting force pairs correctly.

Thank you!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top