Understanding the Definition of Relative: Simplified Explanation for Beginners

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamesfirst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Relative
Click For Summary
The term "relative" refers to the concept of measuring something in relation to another object or frame of reference. For example, two people in a moving car may have a speed of zero relative to each other, even though they are moving at 30 m/s relative to the ground. This concept can also be illustrated through velocity, where two individuals running towards each other can have a combined speed that is different depending on their respective frames of reference. At speeds much lower than light, these calculations are straightforward, but they become complex at relativistic speeds due to effects like time dilation and length contraction. Understanding "relative" as "with respect to" clarifies its application in various scenarios.
jamesfirst
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
What does relative mean..!

I still don't understand the meaning of relative.

I cannot breach onto the concept of Einstein's Principles of Relativity without knowing the meaning of it!

I searched the internet but all of the definitions listed makes no sense to me..

Can somebody define what relative means in a simple statement..


Kind regards, James
 
Physics news on Phys.org


At speeds far less than light speed, suppose Jack and Jill are both sitting in the front seat of a car moving at 30 m/s relative to the ground. But their speed relative to each other is zero. You can replace the term 'relative' with the phrase 'with respect to' . Or say Dick is running east toward Jane at 5 m/s with respect to (relative to) the ground, and Jane is running west toward Dick at 6 m/s with respect to the ground, then relative to each other, Jane is running west toward Dick at 11 m/s relative to Dick, and Dick is running east toward Jane at 11 m/s relative to Jane. This simple addition of velocities breaks down at speeds that are a significant fraction of lightspeed, due to time dilation and length contraction at those high speeds.
 


PhanthomJay said:
At speeds far less than light speed, suppose Jack and Jill are both sitting in the front seat of a car moving at 30 m/s relative to the ground. But their speed relative to each other is zero. You can replace the term 'relative' with the phrase 'with respect to' . Or say Dick is running east toward Jane at 5 m/s with respect to (relative to) the ground, and Jane is running west toward Dick at 6 m/s with respect to the ground, then relative to each other, Jane is running west toward Dick at 11 m/s relative to Dick, and Dick is running east toward Jane at 11 m/s relative to Jane. This simple addition of velocities breaks down at speeds that are a significant fraction of lightspeed, due to time dilation and length contraction at those high speeds.

Ah in the respect to.


Nice. I understand now.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K