I Simplified explanation of SR for relativity-denier

  • Thread starter Thread starter pellis
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on how to effectively communicate the principles of Einstein's Special Relativity (SR) to those who deny its validity, particularly those resistant to the concept of spacetime. Simplified analogies, such as comparing time dilation to changes in perspective regarding the motion of trains, are proposed, but many participants express skepticism about the potential for persuasion. The consensus suggests that arguing with such individuals is often futile, as they may rely on flawed intuitions and refuse to engage with experimental evidence supporting SR. Practical applications of relativity, like GPS technology and particle accelerators, are highlighted as real-world validations of the theory. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the challenge of changing deeply held beliefs in the face of scientific evidence.
  • #61
Dale said:
Your arguments are fine, but doomed to failure anyway. I would give them this link and then walk away:

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

Any alternative theory must explain all of these experiments. Not just Michelson Morley

I liked how he made space for a whole section just to roast people. It's like the Darwin/Razzy awards but for experimentalists:

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/phys...ments.html#Experiments_not_consistent_with_SR
 
  • Like
Likes Sagittarius A-Star
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
ergospherical said:
I liked how he made space for a whole section just to roast people. It's like the Darwin/Razzy awards but for experimentalists:

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/phys...ments.html#Experiments_not_consistent_with_SR
He mis-spelled the name of the anti-relativist Hartwig Thim.

Thim's dubious IEEE paper "Absence of the relativistic transverse Doppler shift at microwave frequencies":
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1240186

A counter-argument against Thim's anti-SR interpretation of his experiment:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5374026
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
486
Replies
71
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
578
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
10K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
3K