Undergrad Understanding the Dirac Commutation Relations in QFT

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Dirac commutation relations in quantum field theory (QFT) and the confusion surrounding the mathematical representation of the Dirac field. Participants clarify that both sides of the commutation relation involve 4x4 matrices, with indices a and b representing fixed spin states rather than running indices. The distinction between fixed indices and the components of the Dirac spinor is emphasized to resolve misconceptions about the nature of the quantities involved. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the structure of the Dirac field and its implications for quantization in QFT. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the mathematical framework necessary for proper interpretation of the Dirac field's commutation relations.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am reading Peskin's book on QFT and at a point he wants to show that the Dirac field can't be quantified using this commutation relations: ##[\psi_a(x),\psi_b^\dagger(x)]=\delta^3(x-y)\delta_{ab}## (where ##\psi## is the solution to Dirac equation). I am not sure I understand the math behind the commutation relation (I understand why physically it is wrong) as you have a column and a raw vector, so doing the commutation you have the difference between a number and a 4x4 matrix and I am not sure how does this work. Can someone explain it to me? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to solve your misconception about "physically wrong", what you have on the left-hand-side is again a 4x4 matrix (has indices a,b running from 1 to 4), and similarily for the right-hand-side.
 
The in
ChrisVer said:
Just to solve your misconception about "physically wrong", what you have on the left-hand-side is again a 4x4 matrix (has indices a,b running from 1 to 4), and similarily for the right-hand-side.
The indeces a and b are fixed, they don't run from 1 to 4. They just specify the spin state.
 
Silviu said:
The indeces a and b are fixed, they don't run from 1 to 4. They just specify the spin state.
what do you mean by fixed? the equation has 16 fixed numbers in the left-hand-side (like a 4x4 matrix) and 16 fixed numbers in the right hand side (again like a 4x4 matrix).
The indices indicate one of the Dirac 4-spinor components:
\psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_1 \\ \psi_2 \\ \psi_3 \\ \psi_4 \end{pmatrix}
Why would you have vectors then for \psi_a ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K