The commutations relations for left/right handed fermions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter decerto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermions Relations
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the commutation relations for left-handed fermions in the context of quantum field theory. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and implications of these relations, particularly in relation to projection operators and spinor indices.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the initial formulation of left-handed fermions and their commutation relations, expressing uncertainty about further simplification.
  • Several participants agree that the initial steps are correct but express uncertainty about how to express the left-handed commutator in terms of the unprojected commutator.
  • Another participant suggests that the result may be the same as the unprojected case, proposing that it could be expressed as ##P_L \delta(x-y)##, but acknowledges uncertainty.
  • A detailed mathematical approach is provided, where one participant writes out the spinor indices explicitly and derives a relation involving the projection operators and delta functions, leading to a proposed final expression for the commutation relation.
  • There is a mention of the trace properties of gamma matrices and their implications for the dimensions involved, but this is presented as part of the reasoning rather than a settled fact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the initial steps in the derivation but express differing views on how to proceed with the simplification and the implications of the results. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the final form of the commutation relations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of projection operators and spinor indices, which are not fully explored. There is also a reliance on specific definitions and mathematical properties that may not be universally accepted or clarified.

decerto
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
I have a problem where I have to know the commutation relations for left handed fermions. I know
##\psi_L=\frac{1}{2}(1-\gamma^5)\psi##

##\psi^\dagger_L=\psi^\dagger_L\frac{1}{2}(1-\gamma^5)##

and

## \left\{ \psi(x) , \psi^\dagger(y)\right\} = \delta(x-y)##

So writing

## \left\{P_L\psi(x) , \psi^\dagger(y)P_L\right\} ##

##=P_L\psi(x) \psi^\dagger(y)P_L + \psi^\dagger(y)P_LP_L\psi(x)##

And I don't see how I can go any further.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it looks fine up to here...
 
ChrisVer said:
it looks fine up to here...

I need to write the left handed commutator in terms of the unprojected commutator I don't see a nice way to do this? How can I commute the P_L operators past the psi's?
 
I want to say its the same, and will just be ##P_L \delta(x-y)##, but I'm not sure.

Maybe what you can do is write out the spinor indices explicitly. Normally you have :
$$
\left\{\psi^a , \psi^{\dagger b} \right\} = \psi^a \psi^{\dagger b}+\psi^{\dagger b} \psi^a = \delta(x-y) \delta^{ab}
$$
now we want to understand
$$
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ai} \psi^i \psi^{\dagger j}P_L^{jb} + \psi^{\dagger j} P_L^{jb}P_L^{ai} \psi^i
$$

we can combine and use the full commutator:

$$
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ai}P_L^{jb} (\psi^i \psi^{\dagger j} + \psi^{\dagger j} \psi^i)\\
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ai}P_L^{jb} \delta(x-y) \delta^{ij}
$$
you can change the indices with the delta function and use ##P_L^{ai}P_L^{ib} = P_L^{ab}## to combine the projections and get
$$
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ab} \delta(x-y)
$$
If ##a=b## then you get(in D then 4 dimensions)
$$P_L^{aa} = \frac{D}{2} = 2$$
This is because by definition the trace of gamma_5 is zero, and the trace of the identity matrix is D(4).

I think this is right...
 
Thanks, that makes sense, the whole dropping spinor indexes for simplicity makes things less clear sometimes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K