Understanding the English Engineering System: Lbm and Lbf Conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Altairs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the conversion between pound-mass (lbm) and pound-force (lbf) within the English Engineering system. It emphasizes that to convert 51 lbm to lbf, one must account for the gravitational constant (g subscript c), which is approximately 32.2 ft/s², resulting in a direct conversion where 51 lbm equals 51 lbf. Additionally, it highlights that the English system uses slugs as the mass unit, where 1 slug equals 32 pounds. Understanding the distinction between mass and force in this context is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly force and mass
  • Familiarity with the English Engineering system and its units
  • Knowledge of gravitational constants, specifically g subscript c
  • Ability to interpret unit conversions in engineering contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of slugs in the English Engineering system
  • Learn about gravitational constants and their applications in engineering
  • Explore the differences between mass and force in various measurement systems
  • Study unit conversion techniques for engineering calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, physics, and related fields who need to understand the nuances of the English Engineering system and its application in real-world calculations.

Altairs
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
This is the most refined concept I could make by reading wikipedia. Our thermodynamics' teacher today introduced us to the 'real' English Engineering system.

My confusion was that like we know if we want to find the weight of a 51 kg person we would simply multiply it with 10(approx) and get 510 N.If we have 51 lbm and want to convert it into lbf then we can't simply multiply it with 32.2(approx) and get the answer but we will also have to take that 'g subscript c' into account which is also 32.2 and so these two 32.2s cancel out and we get 51lbf.

Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. Just remember in the English system, the direct correlation to the kg is NOT the Lbm. It is the slug. In that case you don't have to worry about Gc.

Take a look here and notice the table at the top of the article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_(mass )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot.
 
There are actually two "British systems".
1. A body with a mass of 1 slug weighs 32 pounds.
2. A body with a mass of 1 pound weighs 32 poundals.
Of course, you have to stick with one or the other throughout a calculation.
So "pound" can mean either "mass" or "force", depending on the system.
One of these systems (I think the poundal) was called the "engineering" system.
In any event, colloquially, if an American "weighs" 220 pounds, his European twin
"weighs" 100 kilo, even if some terms are used incorrectly.
 
Got it. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K