fiziksfun
- 77
- 0
Can someone please explain to me why (2n-1)! = (2n-1)(2n)(2n-1)! ?? I'm very confused.
The equation (2n-1)! = (2n-1)(2n)(2n-1)! is incorrect. The correct relationship is (2n)! = (2n)(2n-1)!, derived from the definition of factorial. The confusion arises from misinterpreting factorial notation. The valid equation is (2n+1)! = (2n+1)(2n)(2n-1)!, which accurately reflects the factorial definition.
PREREQUISITESStudents of mathematics, educators teaching factorial concepts, and anyone interested in combinatorial identities and algebraic proofs.
Yes, you are! Dividing both sides of your formula by (2n-1)! you get 1= (2n-1)(2n) which is NOT true!fiziksfun said:Can someone please explain to me why (2n-1)! = (2n-1)(2n)(2n-1)! ?? I'm very confused.