Understanding the Expression (16) in Kohn Sham Energy Expansion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Expansion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of expression (16) in the context of Kohn-Sham energy expansion, specifically referencing a paper from SciELO. Participants highlight the transition from expression (14) to (16), emphasizing the role of the linear term in electron density and the simplification achieved by incorporating complexities into the exchange-correlation function. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding the Kohn-Sham equations for grasping these transitions in density functional theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Kohn-Sham equations in density functional theory
  • Understanding of exchange-correlation function
  • Familiarity with mathematical expressions in quantum mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of electron density concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Kohn-Sham equations in detail
  • Explore the role of exchange-correlation function in density functional theory
  • Review mathematical techniques for manipulating quantum mechanical expressions
  • Investigate applications of Kohn-Sham theory in computational chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and chemists involved in computational modeling and density functional theory, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of Kohn-Sham energy expressions.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Can anyone help me understand how to arrive at the expression (16) in the following link?

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?scr...0103-50532009000700002&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

I don't see how it follows from insertion into (14), but I have seen exactly this transition happen several places in litterature. There is only a linear term in the electron density, since the Kohn Sham equations has been used to put all the nasty stuff into the exchange-correlation function (as far as I understand).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you be more concrete about which term you don't understand?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K