Understanding the Law of Conservation of Mass: Answers to Your Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter MRCHEM
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Law of Conservation of Mass, particularly addressing the confusion surrounding the creation and rearrangement of atoms during physical and chemical changes. Participants explore the implications of this law in the context of human development and hypothetical scenarios involving atomic destruction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the conservation of mass, questioning how atoms can be rearranged if new atoms seem to be created at birth.
  • Another participant asserts that atoms are not created but recycled, emphasizing that atoms consumed by a mother contribute to the development of a fetus.
  • It is suggested that atoms from food are used to build the fetus and to replace atoms in the mother's body, indicating a movement rather than creation of atoms.
  • A simpler explanation is provided, stating that a fetus is formed from existing atoms that have been converted from food into biological structures.
  • A hypothetical scenario involving a bomb capable of destroying Earth raises questions about the rearrangement of atoms in extreme conditions.
  • Responses indicate that atoms would be dispersed due to kinetic energy from an explosion, but creation or destruction of atoms is not possible under normal circumstances, except in specific quantum contexts.
  • Participants note that the atomic makeup of a person is a combination of existing atomic mass from both parents, highlighting the role of DNA and organic compounds in this process.
  • There is a light-hearted acknowledgment of the types of atoms that would remain after a hypothetical explosion, with a mention of iron, nickel, and silicon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that atoms are not created or destroyed but rather rearranged or recycled. However, there are differing views on the implications of this law in extreme scenarios, such as explosions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of atomic interactions and the conditions under which atoms might be altered, which remain unresolved. The implications of quantum theory and the standard model are mentioned but not fully explored.

MRCHEM
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
it is said in our book that when matter undergoes changes whether physicaly or chemically, the atoms are merely rearranged. no atom is created nor destroyed. (the law of conservation of mass)

but isn't it that we are made of atom then if I am made up of atom an atom is created when I am born. I am confused please help me
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
as i said before, atoms arent created, just recycled.
 
As the mother eats atoms of <insert whatever food she eats>, some of the atoms are used to build the developing embryo/fetus, and some go to rebuild the parts of her own body that are losing atoms (such as skin cells that die and get replaced). So atoms are just moved around, not created.
 
Even more simply put:

you - as a newly-created fetus - were created from existing atoms that were eaten by your mother and converted into proteins and other building blocks.
 
what if i have a big bomb that can blow up Earth then how can atom be rearranged or recycled?
 
they would be disperesd from the Kinetic Energy that they receive from the Explotiopn and disintigration of the planetary bodyand no you can't create and destroy atoms (unles you go into quantum theory or beond the standard model) you can change atoms using fusion and fision, but this dosent happen in birth

and ic could potentialy happen in the planetary scenario
 
Yes, you would end up with a bunch of iron and nickel atoms floating around in space.
 
Along with the rearrangment of atoms from consumed food of the mother, you are the combined result of DNA from both parents. DNA is obviously made up of purines and pyrimidines. Purines and pyrimidines are of course organic compounds. So you see, your atomic make-up was never "created," just the combined result of already existing atomic mass.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Yes, you would end up with a bunch of iron and nickel atoms floating around in space.

You forgot silicon :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K