Understanding the Raising and Lowering Operator: A Scientific Analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the mathematical properties and proofs related to the raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics, specifically their action on eigenstates and the implications of these operations. The scope includes theoretical analysis and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the proof involving the lowering operator, stating that it acts on the eigenstate |n⟩ to yield k|n-1⟩, where k is a real and positive constant.
  • The same participant discusses the relationship between the operators and the eigenstates, using the equation $$\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = n|n\rangle$$ to derive that $$k^2 = n$$.
  • Another participant suggests that proving the properties of the raising operator $$\hat a^{\dagger}$$ would be a beneficial exercise.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not explicitly express disagreement, but the discussion remains focused on the mathematical proof without reaching a consensus on the broader implications or interpretations of the operators.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address potential limitations or assumptions underlying the mathematical steps presented, nor does it explore the implications of the results beyond the immediate proof.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying the mathematical foundations of quantum operators and their applications in theoretical physics.

VVS2000
Messages
150
Reaction score
17
TL;DR
I was reading up on linear harmonic oscillator and here when they define 2 new operators for solving the problem.
I still am finding it difficult how they ended up with the relation mentioned in the grey box, describing how the above mentioned operators act on given eigen state
Thanks in advance
16391270426246743881776132983881.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 163912700857921957523044755528.jpg
    163912700857921957523044755528.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 144
Physics news on Phys.org
The proof is not immediately obvious. We start by noting that $$\hat a|n\rangle = k|n-1\rangle$$for some constant ##k##, where we take ##k## to be real and positive by convention. Note that eigenstates are defined only up to a complex phase factor, so we need this convention.

Next, using $$\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = n|n\rangle$$ and the normalisation of ##|n\rangle## we see that$$\langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = \langle n| n|n\rangle = n$$Finally, we evaluate the LHS a different way: $$\langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = \langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}k|n-1\rangle = k\langle n-1|\hat a|n\rangle^* = k\langle n-1|k|n-1\rangle^* = k^2$$using the normalisation of ##|n-1\rangle## and the important identity: $$\langle \psi |\hat X |\phi \rangle = \langle \phi |\hat X^{\dagger} |\psi \rangle^*$$which applies for all vectors and operators. That leads to the required equation $$k^2 = n$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Omega0, Twigg, vanhees71 and 1 other person
PS it would be a good exercise to do the proof for ##\hat a^{\dagger}## yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg and vanhees71
PeroK said:
PS it would be a good exercise to do the proof for ##\hat a^{\dagger}## yourself.
Yeah I will try it for sure,
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K