Undergrad Understanding the Raising and Lowering Operator: A Scientific Analysis

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics, specifically the operator relationships and their implications for eigenstates. It establishes that the lowering operator acts on an eigenstate |n⟩ to yield k|n-1⟩, where k is a positive real constant. The normalization condition of the eigenstates leads to the equation k² = n, demonstrating the connection between the operators and the eigenvalues. The importance of the identity relating inner products of operators is also highlighted. Participants are encouraged to explore the proof for the raising operator independently.
VVS2000
Messages
150
Reaction score
17
TL;DR
I was reading up on linear harmonic oscillator and here when they define 2 new operators for solving the problem.
I still am finding it difficult how they ended up with the relation mentioned in the grey box, describing how the above mentioned operators act on given eigen state
Thanks in advance
16391270426246743881776132983881.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 163912700857921957523044755528.jpg
    163912700857921957523044755528.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 136
Physics news on Phys.org
The proof is not immediately obvious. We start by noting that $$\hat a|n\rangle = k|n-1\rangle$$for some constant ##k##, where we take ##k## to be real and positive by convention. Note that eigenstates are defined only up to a complex phase factor, so we need this convention.

Next, using $$\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = n|n\rangle$$ and the normalisation of ##|n\rangle## we see that$$\langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = \langle n| n|n\rangle = n$$Finally, we evaluate the LHS a different way: $$\langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = \langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}k|n-1\rangle = k\langle n-1|\hat a|n\rangle^* = k\langle n-1|k|n-1\rangle^* = k^2$$using the normalisation of ##|n-1\rangle## and the important identity: $$\langle \psi |\hat X |\phi \rangle = \langle \phi |\hat X^{\dagger} |\psi \rangle^*$$which applies for all vectors and operators. That leads to the required equation $$k^2 = n$$
 
  • Like
Likes Omega0, Twigg, vanhees71 and 1 other person
PS it would be a good exercise to do the proof for ##\hat a^{\dagger}## yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes Twigg and vanhees71
PeroK said:
PS it would be a good exercise to do the proof for ##\hat a^{\dagger}## yourself.
Yeah I will try it for sure,
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Twigg and vanhees71
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K