I Understanding the Raising and Lowering Operator: A Scientific Analysis

VVS2000
Messages
150
Reaction score
17
TL;DR Summary
I was reading up on linear harmonic oscillator and here when they define 2 new operators for solving the problem.
I still am finding it difficult how they ended up with the relation mentioned in the grey box, describing how the above mentioned operators act on given eigen state
Thanks in advance
16391270426246743881776132983881.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 163912700857921957523044755528.jpg
    163912700857921957523044755528.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 129
Physics news on Phys.org
The proof is not immediately obvious. We start by noting that $$\hat a|n\rangle = k|n-1\rangle$$for some constant ##k##, where we take ##k## to be real and positive by convention. Note that eigenstates are defined only up to a complex phase factor, so we need this convention.

Next, using $$\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = n|n\rangle$$ and the normalisation of ##|n\rangle## we see that$$\langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = \langle n| n|n\rangle = n$$Finally, we evaluate the LHS a different way: $$\langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}\hat a |n\rangle = \langle n|\hat a^{\dagger}k|n-1\rangle = k\langle n-1|\hat a|n\rangle^* = k\langle n-1|k|n-1\rangle^* = k^2$$using the normalisation of ##|n-1\rangle## and the important identity: $$\langle \psi |\hat X |\phi \rangle = \langle \phi |\hat X^{\dagger} |\psi \rangle^*$$which applies for all vectors and operators. That leads to the required equation $$k^2 = n$$
 
  • Like
Likes Omega0, Twigg, vanhees71 and 1 other person
PS it would be a good exercise to do the proof for ##\hat a^{\dagger}## yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes Twigg and vanhees71
PeroK said:
PS it would be a good exercise to do the proof for ##\hat a^{\dagger}## yourself.
Yeah I will try it for sure,
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Twigg and vanhees71
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top