QFT question about using momentum raising and lowering operators

  • Thread starter arnshch
  • Start date
  • #1
2
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

How did you find PF?: Google

I know how to express Hamiltonian for scalar field written in field operators through the raising and lowering momentum operators, but I can't figure out how to do the same for the number of particles written in field operators: the 1/2E coefficient within the corresponding integral, doesn't go away in the latter expression, as it does in the former one, and I cannot figure out how to deal with it. Any advise?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2
0
Sorry, I actually want to do the opposite: from the number of particles written through momentum raising and lowering operators to the same number expressed in field operators.
 
  • #3
674
131
Start with $$\phi(\vec {x})=\int \frac{d^{3}k}{\sqrt{2 \omega_k}} a_k ~e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}+ a_k^\dagger~e^{-i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}$$ $$\pi(\vec {x})=-i\int d^{3}k \sqrt{\frac{\omega_k}{2}} a_k ~e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}- a_k^\dagger~e^{-i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}$$ and invert these, should be straightforward from there.
 
  • #4
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,150
6,608
I'm not sure about what the OP's question is. I'd recommend to start with a finite volume with periodic boundary conditions on the fields (operators) to get rid of all kinds of problems with ##\delta## distributions.

Then it depends on how you normalize your annihilation-creation operators in the mode decomposition, which factors enter into the "number operators". If you want to get the simple relation ##\hat{N}(\vec{k},\sigma)=\hat{a}^{\dagger}(\vec{x}) \hat{a}(\vec{x})## you have to normalize by the (anti-)commutator relations
$$[\hat{a}(\vec{k}),\hat{a}^{\dagger}(\vec{k}')]_{\pm}=\delta_{\vec{k},\vec{k'}},$$
where here in the finite volume limit we have Kronecker-##\delta##'s.

Then for the non-interacting particles you get
$$\hat{H}=\sum_{\vec{k}} \vec{k} \hat{N}(\vec{k}), \hat{\vec{P}}=\sum_{\vec{k}} \vec{k} \hat{N}(\vec{k})$$
etc.
 

Related Threads on QFT question about using momentum raising and lowering operators

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
763
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
406
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top