Understanding the Relationship Between Mass and Inertia in Circular Motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between mass, inertia, and the banking of curves in circular motion. The original poster expresses confusion about how the law of inertia relates to the banking angle, which is claimed to be independent of mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Newton's first law and centripetal force equations, questioning how mass influences friction and acceleration. There is a focus on the cancellation of mass in the equations and its relevance to the banking angle.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the question, with some suggesting that the mass cancellation provides insight into the independence of the banking angle from mass. There is a recognition of confusion regarding the question's intent, but also a movement towards clarifying the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of clarity about the question being asked, which may affect their understanding of the relationship between mass, inertia, and the mechanics of banking curves.

loka
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Mass of an object doesn't affect the angle at which a curve must be banked. The law of inertia, however, states that the motion of any object is affected by its inertia, w/c depends on its mass. How can objects rounding banked curves obey the law of inertia if the amount of banking required for a curve of a given radius of curvature and speed is independent of mass?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Totally clueless! >.<

I just know it has something to do with N1:

Newton's first law of motion states that "An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force."

...and Fc=mv2/R
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so mv^2/r is the centripetal acceleration that needs to be balanced by a frictional force. How does the equation for that frictional force depend on m?
 
hmmm ok...so

Fc = mv2/R

Ff = mu*Fn
= mu*mg

Fc = Ff
mv2/R = mu*mg

so the masses cancel out?

...the thing is I don't even get what the question is asking?
 
Yes, the mass cancels out. Isn't that what the question is asking? There should be an angle in your friction but that's not even terribly important. The acceleration is proportional to mass and so is the friction.
 
but am i not just proving what was already stated in the question? Which is that radius and speed don't rely on mass?

I'm just terribly confused of the question...shouldn't I incorporate N1 in my conclusion but I just don't seem to get it...
 
I think you should read the question again. It looks to me like it's asking why is the banking angle independent of mass if the inertia is dependent on mass. If the mass cancels, isn't that the answer? Am I reading it wrong? How are you reading it?
 
Oooo that makes more sense...thanks for rephrasing it!

maybe I was just complicating the question...

Thanks again for your help. ^^,
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K