Understanding the Relationship Between Natural Logarithms and Their Reciprocals

  • Thread starter Thread starter alijan kk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm Natural
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between natural logarithms and their reciprocals, specifically examining the equation 1/loga(e) = loge(a). Participants are exploring the intuitive understanding and proof of this relationship.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how the two logarithmic expressions are reciprocals and are seeking a more intuitive explanation. Some are attempting to prove the relationship and discussing equivalent forms of logarithmic equations.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations and approaches being explored, with some participants offering insights into logarithmic identities and relationships. Guidance has been provided regarding the equivalence of logarithmic expressions, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive proof.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the problem statement may be missing context or clarity, and there is an acknowledgment of the difficulty in proving the relationship. The discussion includes references to specific values and identities related to logarithms.

alijan kk
Messages
130
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


1/loga(e) = loge(a)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


how they are reciprocals of each other ? is their any longer but intuative way to show this result
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you mean:
\frac{1}{\log_a(e)} = \log_e(a)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alijan kk
phyzguy said:
I think you mean:
\frac{1}{\log_a(e)} = \log_e(a)
yes sir i mean that
 
alijan kk said:
how they are reciprocals of each other ? is their any longer but intuative way to show this result

##a^{\log_a(e)}=e##, right? Just take ##\log_e## of both sides.
 
There's an important part missing from your problem statement:
alijan kk said:

Homework Statement


Prove that[/B] 1/loga(e) = loge(a)
Along the lines of Dick's hint are these relationships:
##y = \log_a(x) \Leftrightarrow x = a^y##
I.e., the two equations are equivalent: any pair of values (x, y) that satisfies the first equation also satisfies the second equation, and vice versa.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and alijan kk
Mark44 said:
There's an important part missing from your problem statement:

Along the lines of Dick's hint are these relationships:
##y = \log_a(x) \Leftrightarrow x = a^y##
I.e., the two equations are equivalent: any pair of values (x, y) that satisfies the first equation also satisfies the second equation, and vice versa.
Here is a way that I like to remember it. When I see ##y = \log_a(x) ## and want to convert it to something like ##x = a^y,## I use this to help remember.

Think of log base 10. So we have ##y = \log_{10}(1000) ##. This is pretty easy, there are 3 zeros and the answer is y = 3. The log is equivalent to the exponent.
We have 103 = 1000.
 
scottdave said:
The log is equivalent to the exponent.
Not only that -- a logarithm is by definition an exponent. Specifically, ##\log_a(x)## represents the exponent on a that produces x.
Using your example, ##\log_{10}(1000) = 3## because ##10^3 = 1000##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
I think the relation in the problem statement is true for all positive real a and e. I found this rather difficult to prove. I had to go to a spreadsheet and plug in some values to convince myself it was true. My proof starts with the statement "a=a." Then I substitute an exponential for a on the left hand side. I think I am not supposed to give the full solution here. Good luck! :)
 
Gene Naden said:
I think the relation in the problem statement is true for all positive real a and e.
It wasn't stated in the first post, but the equation is an identity. Yes, it is true for all a > 0, and e is "the natural number," approximately 2.718.

Gene Naden said:
I found this rather difficult to prove.
It's not difficult to prove. Let ##y = \log_a(e)##. This is equivalent to the equation ##e = a^y##. Substitute for e in the expression on the left side of the original equation, ##\frac 1 {log_a(e)}##, and within a couple of steps you end up with the expression on the right side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alijan kk and scottdave
  • #10
You can convert a log of one base to another base. I'm on my phone so I'm not sure if I can do LateX correctly though. If you have log(x) in base b. You can calculate it by LN(x) / LN(b), where LN is the natural log (log base e)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alijan kk
  • #11
So using that, substitute LN(e) for 1.
 
  • #12
Oops, I meant loga(a) = 1
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K