Understanding the Relationship between Variables in a Wave Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the wave equation y(x,t) = A sin(kx - ωt) and the independence of the variables x and t. It clarifies that while x represents spatial position and t represents time, they do not have a direct relationship; instead, they can be analyzed independently. The equation describes a wave that can be visualized at a fixed time or position, allowing for the exploration of wave behavior over time or space. A user shares their experience of using a spreadsheet to generate a sinusoidal wave, reinforcing the concept of independent variables. Overall, the conversation enhances understanding of how to graph functions dependent on two variables in wave equations.
bluestar
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I am unable to determine the relationship between x and t in the following equation.

<br /> y\left(x,t\right)=A\sin\left( kx-\omega t \right)\\<br />


If \nu=\frac{x}{{t}} then the numbers within the bracket goes to zero; because kx=\omega t
for all points on y(x,t).

Can anyone enlighten me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x and t are independent variables; there is no relationship between them. That equation describes a wave. Pick any time t_0, then you can look at the whole wave in space (along x). Pick a point x_0, and you can see how that point oscillates in time. Both can be looked at independently.
 
I set-up a spreadsheet and generated a sinusoidal wave starting at x0 which progresses parallel along the positive x-axis.
If I leave t=0, then any value I plugged in for x falls on the curve.
Likewise, if I left x=0, then any value I plugged in for t falls on the curve.

Does this mean when one variable has a value then the other must be 0?
 
No. It's a wave function of two free variables, x and t--longitudinal position and time. Pick any constant t and you have a standing wave at t. Let t be a variable to see the evolution of the wave over time.
 
Last edited:
I had trouble grasping the concept of how to graph a function depended on two variables. I found a site that presented a simple Gaussian wave and then progressed to a Gaussian Wave dependent on two variables. The page wraps up with a general equation of a cosine function dependent on two variable including axes offsets.

I found it to be a great site for explaining the implication of a function with two independent variable. Now I understand a little better what is happening in the wave equation.


http://resonanceswavesandfields.blogspot.com/2007/08/true-waves.html
 
bluestar said:
I had trouble grasping the concept of how to graph a function depended on two variables.

In 3D space a function of two variables can be drawn as a surface, wavy in both directions in your case.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K