Understanding the Spring Constant: Solving a Practical Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the spring constant of a 1-meter spring that extends to 1.3 meters when a 500-gram mass is added. The correct approach involves recognizing that the mass of the spring itself contributes to the extension, effectively acting as half its mass at the top. The formula K = mg/x is applicable, where m includes both the unknown mass and the 500 grams, and x is the total extension of 0.2 meters. This understanding clarifies the relationship between mass and spring extension, leading to accurate calculations of the spring constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of mass and gravitational force (g = 9.81 m/s²)
  • Familiarity with the concept of mass distribution in springs
  • Ability to perform calculations involving linear equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Hooke's Law and its applications in physics
  • Learn about the effects of mass distribution on spring behavior
  • Explore practical examples of spring constant calculations in engineering
  • Investigate the impact of different materials on spring performance
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding spring mechanics and calculating spring constants in practical applications.

louis2014
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(Moderator note: moved from technical forums, so no template)

Does anyone know how to answer this question?

A 1 meter spring lies horizontally on a table. You hang it vertically being held by one of its ends. Because of the mass of the spring itself it now extends to 1.1 meter. You hang a holder of unknown mass and now it's 1.2 meters long. You decide to hang a 500 gram mass on the holder and now, it's 1.3 meters long.
What is the spring constant of the spring?

I tried to use K = mgx, with m=0.5kg, g=9.81m/s2, and x=1.3-1.1m but the answer was not correct.
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The stretch is going to be proportional to the mass hanging from the bottom.

The mass of the spring affects the top of the spring more than the bottom. In fact, it has it's full effect on the top and no effect on the bottom. On average, its effect is the same as half the spring mass.

So that first 0.1M stretch is the same as if the spring was massless and you were hanging half the actual spring mass off the end of the spring. Then the unknown mass gives you another 0.1M. And the known mass of 500 grams gives you 0.1M.

So right away, you should be able to compute the unknown masses.
 
.Scott said:
The stretch is going to be proportional to the mass hanging from the bottom.

The mass of the spring affects the top of the spring more than the bottom. In fact, it has it's full effect on the top and no effect on the bottom. On average, its effect is the same as half the spring mass.

So that first 0.1M stretch is the same as if the spring was massless and you were hanging half the actual spring mass off the end of the spring. Then the unknown mass gives you another 0.1M. And the known mass of 500 grams gives you 0.1M.

So right away, you should be able to compute the unknown masses.
Oh I see, I was reading the question as the 500g mass replaced the original mass when it really was added to it. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K