Understanding the Uncertainty Principle and Quantum Tunneling

  • Thread starter Thread starter r-dizzel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the distance at which the probability of finding an electron with 100 eV of kinetic energy falls to 1/e of its original value when incident on a potential barrier of height 110 eV. The participant is advised to match wavefunction amplitudes across the boundary to determine the amplitude ratio, which is essential for solving the problem. The connection to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is acknowledged but not fully explored. The calculation of wavefunctions is crucial for understanding the behavior of the electron in this quantum scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Wavefunction calculations
  • Understanding of potential barriers in quantum physics
  • Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of wavefunctions in quantum tunneling scenarios
  • Learn about potential barriers and their impact on particle behavior
  • Explore the implications of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the concept of probability amplitudes in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, physicists working on quantum tunneling problems, and anyone interested in the applications of the uncertainty principle in particle physics.

r-dizzel
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
uncertain about this??

evenin' all!
wonder if anyone can help...

the question is this-

(sorry by the way if this is wrong place to post this, bit of a newbee!)

an electron has 100eV of kinetic energy, its incident on a potential barrier of height 110eV. At what distance x does the probability of finding the electron fall to 1/e of its value at x = 0? compare this with what might of be expeceted from Heisenbergs uncertainty principle.

ive calculated the wavefunctions in and before the boundary but don't really understand what the questions asks "falls to 1/e of its original value"? surely e on its own is meaningless?

the final part about the Heisenbergs unc princ i get but i thought i'd complete the questions.

would really appreciate any help

over and out

r dizzel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll probably get a better response if you show more of your work explicitly (i.e. the wavefunctions you've calculated). Anyway, presumably you've matched the two wavefunction amplitudes such that they are continuous across the boundary? Then just find the amplitude ratio so that the new amplitude is
[tex]e^-^1 = \frac{1}{e^1} = \frac{1}{2.718...}[/tex]

of the initial value.
 
Last edited:
cheers dude, will have a bash
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K