Undergrad Uniform closure of algebra of bounded functions is uniformly closed

  • Thread starter Thread starter psie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Real analysis
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the definitions and properties of algebras of bounded functions, specifically focusing on the uniform closure of such algebras. It establishes that if a family of functions is uniformly closed, it contains all limits of uniformly convergent sequences from that family. The theorem presented asserts that the uniform closure of an algebra of bounded functions is itself a uniformly closed algebra. The conversation highlights the challenge of proving that if a function is in the uniform closure, it must also be in the closure of the original algebra. Ultimately, it confirms that the uniform closure and the closure of the algebra coincide in the context of bounded functions equipped with the uniform metric.
psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
I'm reading theorem 7.29 in Rudin's PMA. I struggle with a seemingly basic conclusion Rudin makes regarding the uniform closure ##\mathcal B## of some algebra ##\mathcal A## of bounded functions, namely that it is uniformly closed.
First some definitions:

Definition A family ##\mathcal A## of complex or real functions defined on a set ##E## is said to be an algebra if it is closed under addition, multiplication and scalar multiplication.

Definition If ##\mathcal A## has the property that ##f\in\mathcal A## whenever ##f_n\in \mathcal A## (##n=1,2,\ldots##) and ##f_n\to f## uniformly on ##E##, then ##\mathcal A## is said to be uniformly closed.

Definition Let ##\mathcal B## be the set of all functions which are limits of uniformly convergent sequences of members of ##\mathcal A##. Then ##\mathcal B## is called the uniform closure of ##\mathcal A##.

Theorem 7.29 Let ##\mathcal{B}## be the uniform closure of an algebra ##\mathcal{A}## of bounded functions. Then ##\mathcal{B}## is a uniformly closed algebra.

After Rudin has shown that ##\mathcal B## is an algebra, he invokes another theorem to claim it is uniformly closed. That theorem states that if ##X## is a metric space and ##E\subset X##, then ##\overline E## is closed. I don't understand Rudin's reasoning here, and I've tried to go back to the basics.

If we denote ##X=\mathbb R^S## the set of all bounded functions from ##S## to ##\mathbb R##, equipped with the uniform metric, I'm trying to show that given ##\mathcal A\subset X##, the uniform closure ##\mathcal B## of ##\mathcal A## is simply ##\overline{\mathcal A}##. That is, I'm trying to prove both inclusions in ##\overline{\mathcal A}=\mathcal B##.

One direction is simple. Observe that if ##f\in\overline{\mathcal A}##, then there exists a sequence ##(f_n)\in\mathcal{A}## converging to ##f##. Since the metric is the uniform metric, the convergence is uniform. Thus by definition ##f\in \mathcal B##.

In the other direction, I'm getting stuck. Let ##f\in \mathcal B##. Then by definition, there is ##(f_n) \in \mathcal A## so that ##(f_n)## converges uniformly to ##f## on ##S##. That is, for all ##\epsilon >0## there is ##N\in \mathbb N## so that $$|f_n(x) - f(x)| <\epsilon,$$for all ##x\in S## and ##n\ge N##. The above inequality implies that $$d_\infty (f_n, f) = \sup_{x\in S} |f_n(x) - f(x)| \le \epsilon,$$ for all ##n\ge N##. So ##f_n \to f## in ##(X, d_\infty)##. Here's where I'd like to conclude somehow that ##f## must be a limit point of ##\mathcal A## and thus in ##\overline{\mathcal A}##, but I'm unable to do this since ##f## certainly could be an isolated point, or?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think I've had some time to look at my topology book, and apparently a point ##f## is in the closure of ##\mathcal A## (which is a subset of a metric space) if and only if there's a sequence in ##\mathcal A## converging to ##f##.

I used one direction of this statement already. Where I'm stuck I need to use the other direction.
 
Let ##(X,d_\infty)## be the space of all bounded functions ##f : E \to \mathbb{C}##, equipped with the sup metric ##d_\infty##. Convergence of a sequence of functions with respect to ##d_\infty## is the same as uniform convergence of the sequence. So the condition that ##\mathcal{B}## is the uniform closure of ##\mathcal{A}## means ##\overline{\mathcal{A}} = \mathcal{B}## in ##X##, and the condition that ##\mathcal{B}## is uniformly closed means ##\overline{\mathcal{B}} = \mathcal{B}##. So Theorem 7.29 implies that if ##\mathcal{B} = \overline{\mathcal{A}}##, then ##\overline{\mathcal{B}} = \mathcal{B}##, i.e., ##\mathcal{B}## is closed in ##X##. This indeed follows from the fact that the closure of a subset of a metric space is closed:

Let ##M## be a metric space and ##S\subset M##. Given ##m\in M \setminus S##, there is an open ball ##B\ni x## disjoint from ##S##. Thus ##S## is contained in the closed set ##M\setminus B##, which implies ##\overline{S} \subset M\setminus B##. Therefore ##B\subset M\setminus \overline{S}##, and since ##m## was arbitrary, ##M\setminus \overline{S}## is open. In other words, ##\overline{S}## is closed.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K