Uniform Convergence of f{_n} in Complex Analysis on S=[0,infinity)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the uniform convergence of the sequence of functions \( f_n(z) = n^2 z e^{-nz} \) defined on the interval \( S = [0, \infty) \). Participants explore whether \( f_n \) converges to 0 and if this convergence is uniform.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that \( f_n \) converges to 0 for each fixed \( x_0 \in [0, \infty) \) as \( n \) increases, suggesting that for any \( \varepsilon > 0 \), there exists an \( n_0 \) such that \( f_n(x_0) < \varepsilon \) for all \( n > n_0 \).
  • Others argue that while \( f_n(x) \) tends to 0 pointwise, the maximum value of \( f_n \) occurs at \( x = \frac{1}{n} \), where \( f_n\left(\frac{1}{n}\right) = \frac{n}{e} \) increases without bound as \( n \) increases, indicating that the convergence is not uniform.
  • Participants inquire about methods to demonstrate the pointwise convergence of \( f_n(x) \) to 0, with some suggesting the use of inequalities involving \( \varepsilon \) and logarithmic expressions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on whether the convergence of \( f_n \) is uniform. While some agree on pointwise convergence to 0, others maintain that the lack of uniform convergence is evident due to the behavior of the maximum values of \( f_n \).

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific values and conditions under which convergence is evaluated, indicating that the discussion may depend on the choice of \( x_0 \) and the behavior of \( n \) in relation to \( \varepsilon \). The mathematical steps and assumptions involved in proving convergence remain unresolved.

Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Let S=[0,infinity) and let f{_n}(z)=n^2ze^-(nz) Show that f{_n} -> 0. Is the function uniformly convergent? Sorry about it being unclear but TEX tags don't see to work. f{_n} means f subscript n. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Poirot said:
Let S=[0,infinity) and let f{_n}(z)=n^2ze^-(nz) Show that f{_n} -> 0. Is the function uniformly convergent? Sorry about it being unclear but TEX tags don't see to work. f{_n} means f subscript n. Thanks

If f(*) is defined in $[0,\infty)$ that means that it is a function of real variable x, so that is...

$\displaystyle f_{n}(x)= n^{2}\ x\ e^{-n x}$ (1)

If we consider an $x_{0} \in [0;\infty)$ and a $\varepsilon>0$ it exists an $n_{0}$ for which $\forall n>n_{0}$ is $f_{n}(x_{0})<\varepsilon$ so that $f_{n} \rightarrow 0$. Each $f_{n}(x)$ however has a maximum in $x=\frac{1}{n}$ and here is $f_{n}(\frac{1}{n})= \frac{n}{e}$ that increases without limit with n so that the function doesn't converges uniformly...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Thanks, how would you show

\displaystyle f_{n}(x)= n^{2}\ x\ e^{-n x} tends to 0?
 
Poirot said:
Thanks, how would you show
\displaystyle f_{n}(x)= n^{2}\ x\ e^{-n x} tends to 0?

For $x=x_{0} \in [0,\infty)$ is $\displaystyle f_{n}(x_{0})= n^{2}\ x_{0}\ e^{- n x_{0}}$ so that for an $\varepsilon >0$ it will be $\displaystyle f_{n}(x_{0})<\varepsilon\ \forall n>\frac{2 \ln n -\ln \varepsilon}{\ln x_{0}}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K