MHB Uniformity of Poisson arrivals in random interval

hemanth
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Given that an Poisson arrival has occurred in an interval [0,t], where t is geometric with mean (alpha).
Is it true that the arrival instant is uniform in [0,t]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hemanth said:
Given that an Poisson arrival has occurred in an interval [0,t], where t is geometric with mean (alpha).
Is it true that the arrival instant is uniform in [0,t]?

In a Poisson process with mean $\lambda$ the probability that n events occurred in [0,t] is...

$$ P \{ N(t)-N(0) = n \} = e^{- \lambda\ t}\ \frac{(\lambda\ t)^{n}}{n!}\ (1)$$

Once You know that one event occurred at the time $\tau$ with $0 < \tau < t$, the $tau$ is uniformly distributed in [0,t]...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
hemanth said:
Given that an Poisson arrival has occurred in an interval [0,t], where t is geometric with mean (alpha).
Is it true that the arrival instant is uniform in [0,t]?

Let $T$ be the time of the first arrival, let $\tau$ be an arbitrary time between 0 and t, and let the Poisson distribution have a mean of $\lambda$ arrivals per unit of time.

Then, from the definition of conditional probability:
$$P(T < \tau \ |\ T < t) = \frac{P(T < \tau \wedge T < t)}{P(T<t)} = \frac{P(T < \tau)}{P(T<t)} \qquad (1)$$

From the Poisson distribution we know that:
$$P(T < t) = P(\text{at least 1 arrival in }[0,t]) = 1 - P(\text{0 arrivals in }[0,t]) = 1 - \frac{e^{-\lambda t}(\lambda t)^0}{0!} = 1 - e^{-\lambda t} \qquad (2)$$

So:
$$P(T < \tau \ |\ T < t) = \frac{P(T < \tau)}{P(T<t)} = \frac{1 - e^{-\lambda \tau}}{1 - e^{-\lambda t}} \qquad (3)$$

This is not a uniform distribution.$\qquad \blacksquare$
 
Last edited:
hemanth said:
Given that an Poisson arrival has occurred in an interval [0,t], where t is geometric with mean (alpha).
Is it true that the arrival instant is uniform in [0,t]?

I apologize for the fact that at first I didn't realize that t is a geometric r.v. and not a deterministic r.v., so that I have to better specify my answer. In general in a stationary Poisson process with mean $\lambda$ the probability that n events occur in a time between $\tau$ and $\tau + t$ is... $$P \{ N(\tau + t) - N(\tau) = n\} = e^{- \lambda\ t}\ \frac{(\lambda\ t)^{n}}{n!}\ (1)$$

... and, very important detail, the probability is independent from $\tau$. That means that in the case of one event [n=1], setting $\tau=0$, the event time $t_{0}$ is uniformely distributed in [o,t]. But t is not a deterministic but a geometric variable and that means that we are in the same situation described in...

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f19/transformation-random-variable-5079/#post23090

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top