Union & Set Rules - Learn the Basics Now!

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TinaSprout
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules Set Union
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of unions in set theory, particularly how the union of multiple sets can equal a single set. Participants explore the definitions and properties of unions and intersections, addressing specific examples involving intervals and subsets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how the union of four different sets can equal just one of the sets, questioning the fundamental principles of unions and intersections.
  • Another participant provides an example illustrating that the union of two sets combines all unique elements, noting that overlapping elements are counted only once.
  • A further contribution discusses a specific case where the union of four intervals is shown to equal the interval [-1,1], providing a step-by-step reasoning to support this claim.
  • Another participant suggests visualizing the intervals to clarify the concept, while also discussing the distinction between unions of sets versus unions of sets containing sets.
  • It is noted that all intervals discussed are subsets of [-1, 1], reinforcing the idea that every element in the smaller intervals is already included in the larger interval.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present various viewpoints and examples, but there is no consensus on the initial confusion regarding unions. The discussion remains open with multiple interpretations and clarifications being offered.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of unions and intersections may be implicit, and the discussion relies on specific examples that may not cover all cases or definitions in set theory.

TinaSprout
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am going over some of my notes, and I cannot understand unions, here is the selection I am having trouble with
View attachment 7601

How does the union of four different sets equal just one of the sets? Should the union of 4 sets be the four different sets instead of one.
I am missing something fundamental to unions and intersections.
Thanks for your help!
 

Attachments

  • math help.PNG
    math help.PNG
    4.5 KB · Views: 145
Physics news on Phys.org
TinaSprout said:
I am going over some of my notes, and I cannot understand unions, here is the selection I am having trouble with


How does the union of four different sets equal just one of the sets? Should the union of 4 sets be the four different sets instead of one.
I am missing something fundamental to unions and intersections.
Thanks for your help!

Hi TinaSprout! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

The union of 2 sets is the set that contains all elements that those 2 sets contain.
So e.g. $\{a,b,c\} \cup \{a,d\}=\{a,b,c,d\}$.
That is the combination of all elements.
Note that the element $a$ that is part of both sets, is included once in the union.The notation $[-1,1]$ means that we have a set of infinitely many elements.
Those are all real numbers between -1 and +1.
The union of $[-1,1] \cup [-\frac 12, \frac 12]$ is $[-1,1]$, because it contains all elements of both sets.
That is, it all real numbers between $-\frac 12$ and $\frac 12$ are contained in the interval $[-1,1]$.
 
In this case, if you make a drawing of the four intervals, I think it already becomes clearer.
However, we can also strictly use the definition in your first equation. We are asked to prove that
\[
V_1 \cup V_2 \cup V_3 \cup V_4 = [-1,1], \qquad (\ast)
\]
where $V_i = \left[-\frac{1}{i}, \frac{1}{i}\right]$ for $i = 1,\ldots,4$.

1. First consider $x \in [-1,1]$. Then $x \in V_1$ so, by your definition of "union", $x \in V_1 \cup V_2 \cup V_3 \cup V_4$.

2. Next, consider $x \in V_1 \cup V_2 \cup V_3 \cup V_4$. Then $x$ must be in at least one of the $V_i$. No matter in which $V_i$ it is, note that always $x \ge -1$ and $x \le 1$, but this just means that $x \in [-1,1]$.

So, we have established $(\ast)$.

Note that we could also have considered the sets $W_i = \{V_i\}$ for $i = 1,\ldots,4$. That is, each $W_i$ is a set that has exactly one element, and this element is itself a set: $V_i \in W_i$ for $i = 1,\ldots,4$. Try to understand that in this case,
\[
W_1 \cup W_2 \cup W_3 \cup W_4 = \{V_1, V_2, V_3, V_4\},
\]
which is a set consisting of four elements, each element being a set by itself. In particular, the union of the $W_i$ is not equal to the interval $[-1,1]$.
 
In brief, all of those intervals, [math]\left[-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right][/math], [math]\left[-\frac{1}{3},\frac{1}{3}\right][/math], etc. Are subsets of [-1, 1]. Every member of each interval is already in [-1, 1].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K