MHB Unit sum composed of unit fractions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether a unit sum composed of unit fractions must include 1/2. Initial thoughts suggest that it might be necessary, but examples demonstrate that it is not. The Erdos-Graham problem is referenced to support the idea that distinct unit fraction representations can exist without including 1/2. Additionally, participants clarify that there are infinitely many representations of non-unit fractions as sums of distinct unit fractions. Ultimately, it is established that a unit sum can be achieved without the inclusion of 1/2.
poissonspot
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Is it necessary for a unit sum composed of unit fractions to include 1/2? Doing maple runs this seems to be the case, but it is not evident to me how this could be

Edit: In fact it seems it could not be, given the Erdos Graham problem Erd?s?Graham problem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But considering an arbitrary fraction and one minus it, it seems the unit fraction representation of one of these two's parts is bound to include 1/2.

I feel a bit mixed up here.

EditEdit:1/3+1/4+1/5+1/6+1/20 does it. I think I thought that distinct unit fraction representations were unique. But this is not the case clearly.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is it necessary for a unit sum composed of unit fractions to include 1/2?

No. 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1.

EDIT : Nontrivial 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/20 = 1.
 
mathbalarka said:
No. 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1.

I'm afraid I'm being awfully careless in the statement. thank you,
 
I also gave a non-trivial example there, you might want to look at that.
 
mathbalarka said:
I also gave a non-trivial example there, you might want to look at that.

Thanks. I figured that out and edited the first post just before you posted.

I did not think that there are infinitely many representations of a non unit fraction in terms of distinct unit fractions and so thought that given one I had the only one that would do so.
 
conscipost said:
Given one I had the only one that would do so.

$$\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{7} + \frac{1}{9} + \frac{1}{11} + \frac{1}{15} + \frac{1}{33} + \frac{1}{45} + \frac{1}{385} = 1$$

There exists trivially infinitely many unit fractions with not just without 2 but with odd denominator which sum up to unity.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
17K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K