Universe or Multiverse? (new w/cosmic natural selection chapter)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the book "Universe or Multiverse?" published by Cambridge University Press, featuring contributions from prominent physicists such as Lee Smolin, Steven Weinberg, and Frank Wilczek. The book, available for pre-order, explores the Anthropic Principle and introduces the Cosmological Natural Selection (CNS) hypothesis, which posits that fundamental physical parameters are optimized for black hole formation. The CNS hypothesis is presented as a falsifiable scientific theory, with implications for cosmology and discussions surrounding multiverse theories. The book aims to frame the debate on the Anthropic Principle and multiverse concepts, providing diverse perspectives on these complex topics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Anthropic Principle in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the Cosmological Natural Selection (CNS) hypothesis
  • Knowledge of black hole formation and astrophysical parameters
  • Basic concepts of multiverse theories and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Cosmological Natural Selection (CNS) hypothesis in detail
  • Explore the Anthropic Principle and its critiques in scientific literature
  • Study the implications of multiverse theories on cosmology and physics
  • Examine the contributions of key authors like Lee Smolin and Steven Weinberg
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of the Anthropic Principle and multiverse theories will benefit from this discussion. Additionally, students and researchers in astrophysics and theoretical physics will find valuable insights into current debates in the field.

  • #31
http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/04/27/how-did-the-universe-start/

Here is Sean Carroll's Blog.

Multi-verse is the answer to cosmology.

It is the ONLY way to find the 'mechanisms' for "How things are working'.

MBH's ARE the 'mechanisms'! For the Darkness/Exotic Dark Matter/Point Particles, which gets here FIRST!

And for the Light/Energy/EM/Strong/Weak forces, which get here when the MBH's are created IN OUR UNIVERSE.

The Problem: the universe's initial conditions are due to singularities, BUT NOTHING can come 'through' a "NAKED SINGULARITY"!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
RussT said:
http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/04/27/how-did-the-universe-start/

Here is Sean Carroll's Blog.

quite a mix of fashionable ideas but so scattered I can't get much out of it. I can see why the cosmologist Bernard Carr, when he was putting this Uni/Multi book together, might have chosen not to include an essay along those lines. In any case he put in people with established track-records and scholarly reputation, like Steven Weinberg, Lee Smolin, Frank Wilczek, George Ellis, Jim Hartle, Max Tegmark, Leonard Susskind (for better or worse), Stephen Hawking etc. These people have had something definite and nontrivial to say in the past, whether it was right or wrong, so there should be some interesting essays in the book.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
The real problem is that science has defined itself right into a no-win corner where the answer for how the universe works is actually Career Suicide to even consider!
 
  • #34
RussT said:
The real problem is that science has defined itself right into a no-win corner where the answer for how the universe works is actually Career Suicide to even consider!

Regardless of anything, I think there is a clear conflict of the measure of optimation in any similar situation.

The idea to get payed and at the same time do what is close to your heart sure sounds nice, but is that really the way it works?

It's like they say, business is business. At some point it's a personal choice, what is more important in life. Fight for what you believe in, or get food on the table :cry: It seems the choice tends to be a balance.

/Fredrik
 
  • #35
For those interested you can listen to a short 15 minute discussion about the Universe/Multiverse debate http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/thematerialworld_20070531.shtml" with Martin Rees, Neil Turok and Bernard Carr.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Graduate Can Cosmic Inflation and String Theory change fundamental laws?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate Elsevier handbook re: Cosmic Natural Selection
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate Foundations of Space and Time (edited by Ellis et al, to appear)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Graduate Before the Big Bang now a topic for wider audience
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K