Unlock the Power of Calculus: Algebra 1 to Boaz for Students

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the potential benefits of introducing calculus concepts early in the math curriculum, particularly after Algebra 1 or integrated into Algebra 1 courses. Resources such as a specific book and a website are recommended for students to enhance their understanding of topics like logarithms and trigonometric functions. The conversation emphasizes that knowledge of calculus can simplify these concepts and suggests that students could effectively transition to more advanced topics without needing a traditional calculus course. The mention of specific books and courses indicates a belief that calculus should be taught earlier in education to better prepare students for advanced mathematics. Additionally, there is an interest in feedback from those who try these resources.
Messages
10,918
Reaction score
3,793
Here is an interesting book a student could do after after Algebra 1, or even integrate into an Algebra 1 course:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077VV95N3/?tag=pfamazon01-20

And a website:
https://www.calculussolution.com/

Several topics become easier, such as logarithms, when you know a smattering of Calculus. You could incorporate knowing it into an Algebra 2/Precalculus course. As it stands, you could probably cover trig functions etc. not covered is the 5-hour course from Kleppner in the last few weeks (which I know is enough to do Boaz):
https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/0471827223/

Having a copy of Boaz, I am confident they would know enough to start on that rather than a traditional Calculus course e.g. it covers series, complex numbers etc., all of which will not need to be covered in the Algebra 2/Precalculus course. I am one of those people that think Calculus is not taught early enough.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Physics news on Phys.org
The Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus and why it makes solving integrals trivial. Page 114.

Someone call wolfram alpha!

I'm interested to hear if anyone tries this how it is.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes bhobba and malawi_glenn
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top