Unpacking Dilbert's Math: Is Mr. Adams Right?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BSMSMSTMSPHD
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a comic strip from Dilbert that features a mathematical error regarding budget estimation. Participants explore whether the creator, Scott Adams, is aware of this error or if it reflects a broader issue of innumeracy. The conversation touches on themes of humor, mathematical literacy, and audience comprehension.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether Scott Adams is aware of the mathematical inaccuracy in the comic regarding budget percentages.
  • Others suggest that the error may be a deliberate choice to cater to a lay audience that might not grasp the complexities of percentages.
  • A participant reflects on a personal anecdote about correcting a colleague's minor mathematical error, suggesting that humor can sometimes take precedence over accuracy.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of Mensa membership and its relation to mathematical literacy, with some arguing that intelligence does not guarantee error-free computations.
  • Some participants express a preference for the humor in Foxtrot, noting that it may appeal more to a geekier audience, while acknowledging that Dilbert is more accessible to the general public.
  • One participant points out that the comic's humor might not improve with mathematical accuracy, indicating that the joke's effectiveness may rely on the error itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether Scott Adams intentionally included the error or if it was a genuine mistake. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the error and its implications for humor and audience understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the discussion hinges on assumptions about audience comprehension of mathematical concepts and the role of humor in conveying ideas. There are unresolved questions about the impact of mathematical accuracy on the effectiveness of the comic.

BSMSMSTMSPHD
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Has anyone read their Sunday comics yet today? Here are the first three frames of Dilbert:

1. Boss: Your project came in 10% over budget.

2. Dilbert: Actually, it came in at exctly what I estimated.

3. Dilbert: You cut my budget by 10% because you wanted to feel like a leader.

These are not the same! For example, if the original budget had been $100, then it was cut to $90. Therefore, 10% over budget would be $99, not $100.

I post this only to ask - do you think Mr. Adams knows of this error, or is this just another example of innumeracy in the general community?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So, if Mr. Adams had said the project came in 9% over budget, how would that have made the comic funnier?
 
Many years ago I corrected a colleague for a similar minor infraction. He jokingly responded, "Are you going to call me a lier for 1%?" I think we both laughed at what was actually a keen observation.

Yes, I think he realized his inaccuracy before I opened my mouth, but he was interested in conveying an idea, not producing a mathematically accurate solution to a problem.
 
So, if Mr. Adams had said the project came in 9% over budget, how would that have made the comic funnier?

It wouldn't have, but that wasn't my question. I'm just curious if you think he knew about the error. I'm not into nitpicking, I just like to think about the ways in which people think about mathematics.

Q_Goest: I'm sure your colleague did know of his error since he made the 1% comment. Mr. Adams worked for a telephone company and is now a comic, so, again, I wonder if he knows.
 
The only way you can find out if he knows is to ask him (by email or whatever).

BTW, the author of the Dilbert comic series is plenty smart - he's a member of Mensa. Consider the very likely possibility that he's making a deliberate error to pander to a lay audience that mostly doesn't understand the finer points of percentages and reciprocals and wouldn't get the joke if he'd been mathematically accurate.
 
While I agree with most of your statement, membership in Mensa does not endure mathematical literacy. There are plenty of intelligent people who still make errors with simple computations.

I wonder why he used percentages in the first place. If the statements had been made with, say, $1000 instead of 10% then they would be correct.

I will always enjoy Dilbert, but when looking for mathematical humor I think I will stick with Foxtrot.
 
BSMSMSTMSPHD said:
While I agree with most of your statement, membership in Mensa does not endure mathematical literacy. There are plenty of intelligent people who still make errors with simple computations.

Did you mean "ensure" instead of "endure"?

I doubt someone in the top 2% of the population would've trouble with a simple concept like this, even if their entire education was in the liberal arts. Maybe it was a genuine mistake (due to inattention) at the time, but I'm willing to bet he'll be able to see the error immediately if he had it pointed out to him.

I still think it's a matter of pandering rather than a genuine mistake. Seriously, no-one "normal" would've gotten the joke if he'd done it mathematically right.

I haven't seen anything especially erudite coming out of Foxtrot, I will concede their humor is slanted a bit more geekily though. Even then, some lay readers will be alienated by it - I have a Foxtrot clipping parodying the Linux/Windows situation pinned to my cubicle wall and very few people "get" it (I work in a hospital, not geek central). Dilbert is probably more accessible than Foxtrot, a lot of people have at least a passing familiarity with management dogma (obvious pun on Dogbert not intended).
 
Yeah, they put the damn d right next to the s on the keyboard. Whoever thought of that should be abashed and chagrined.

I see what you're saying, and I agree that 1) he would understand the error immediately, 2) the strip would not have been better if it had been correct and 3) he may have known about the error in advance.

I also agree that Foxtrot will miss the general public. I admire the author for going outside the typical political satire, though. Here are some examples that I found online for the unfamiliar:

http://www.madcool.com/cgi-bin/if/imageFolio.cgi?action=view&link=FoxTrot&image=Math.jpg&img=&tt=

http://math.sfsu.edu/beck/images/foxtrot.600percen.increase.gif

http://math.sfsu.edu/beck/images/foxtrot.glass.half.full.gif

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?i...math+foxtrot&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=G

http://www.prolynx.com/walinchi/jokes/foxtrot.gif

http://www.abc-canada.org/math_literacy/media/home_fox_trot_comic.gif

http://www.sjsd.net/~ledwards/00AD8D10-00802E21.1/Foxtrot1_0001.jpg

http://www.math.wustl.edu/~victor/classes/puzzles/ft.gif

He also likes physics:

http://ceae.rutgers.edu/physics/foxtrot.jpeg

http://physics.umbc.edu/~worchesk/Physics121/foxtrot.jpg

These are the few examples I could find. There are many, many more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
14K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K