physicallove
- 3
- 0
why does mercury move with such velocity while pluto is much slower?
The discussion revolves around the differences in orbital velocities of Mercury and Pluto, exploring the underlying principles of planetary motion and gravitational forces. It touches on theoretical aspects, mathematical reasoning, and conceptual clarifications related to Kepler's Laws and centripetal acceleration.
Participants present various viewpoints and explanations, but there is no consensus on the clarity or usefulness of the mathematical reasoning for the original poster's understanding.
The discussion includes assumptions about gravitational forces and their variation with distance, which may not be fully articulated. The mathematical steps and their implications are not resolved.
Dickfore said:The centripetal acceleration is:
<br /> a = \frac{v^{2}}{r}<br />
If this acceleration is provided by a gravitational force $F(r)$ from the Sun, that somehow varies with distance, then:
<br /> F(r) = m a<br />
From here. by knowing how the force varies with distance, we can find how the velocity varies with distance:
<br /> v(r) = \sqrt{\frac{r F(r)}{m}}<br />
The velocity will not depend on distance iff:
<br /> F(r) = O(\frac{1}{r})<br />
If the gravitational force falls off with distance faster than this, then the orbital velocity of more distant bodies should decrease. On the other hand, if it falls off more slowly, then it will increase.