Update on liquid water on Mars - maybe it is sand?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Mars Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

NASA's 2015 discovery of potential liquid water on Mars has been challenged by a new study suggesting that the observed material transport is due to sand rather than water. The rovers currently avoid these intriguing features to prevent contamination, as they may harbor life. The discussion also touches on the possibility of finding ancient fossils and the composition of Martian water, which may consist of remnants from cometary ices rather than liquid water. The Deuterium/Hydrogen (D/H) ratio of Martian water does not align with that of comet water, indicating further investigation is necessary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Martian geology and surface features
  • Familiarity with planetary science concepts, particularly regarding water on Mars
  • Knowledge of the Deuterium/Hydrogen ratio and its significance in astrobiology
  • Awareness of the history of Mars exploration and NASA's findings
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the D/H ratio in Martian water studies
  • Explore the role of sand in Martian surface processes and its impact on rover missions
  • Investigate the history of water on Mars and its potential sources, including cometary impacts
  • Study the methods used in analyzing Martian soil and water composition
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, planetary scientists, and researchers interested in astrobiology and the search for life on Mars will benefit from this discussion.

Messages
37,404
Reaction score
14,236
NASA announced in 2015 that they found some evidence for the existence of liquid water on Mars today - at least temporarily and underground.

A new study comes to a different conclusion and proposes sand as origin of the observed material transport downhill.

As interesting as these features are, the rovers on the ground stay away from them - exactly because they are interesting. The rovers are not completely sterile, so NASA avoids going close to places where there is a remote chance that life could survive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and ISamson
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Does that question that significant amount of frozen water can be found? (Possibly used by a small greenhouse experiment?)
 
This is unrelated to the ice that has been found independently.
 
Here is a Science magazine news article interviewing one of the guys who did this research.
Lots in statements about lots of interesting subjects: RSL, water on Mars, where to look for life, ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Tardigrades could make the crossing and survive. It would be interesting to see how well they mobilized and reproduced (if at all) under the extreme conditions of Mars; not to mention what would they eat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unusually_wrong
In my (unverified) opinion the only water we will find on Mars, will test out to be remnants of cometary ices. Of recent bombardment, on a random basis. Of short duration before evaporation and sublimation to Solar radiation.

Maybe, under all the gigatonnage of debris left from billions of years of rocks falling from space. Maybe, we'll find a few, very ancient archaic fossils. Maybe, maybe not.

"By Popular Demand!" Most likely to be found will be Piltdown Man type frauds. To fleece the hopeful and defraud the gullible.
 
r8chard said:
In my (unverified) opinion the only water we will find on Mars, will test out to be remnants of cometary ices.

The D/H ratio of Martian water doesn't fit to comet water (if the values from 67P are representative).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
DrS, I would be interested in following up on your information. Could you please include a pointer to the comet analysis.
 
  • #10
  • #13
r8chard said:
In my (unverified) opinion the only water we will find on Mars, will test out to be remnants of cometary ices. Of recent bombardment, on a random basis. Of short duration before evaporation and sublimation to Solar radiation.

Maybe, under all the gigatonnage of debris left from billions of years of rocks falling from space. Maybe, we'll find a few, very ancient archaic fossils. Maybe, maybe not.

"By Popular Demand!" Most likely to be found will be Piltdown Man type frauds. To fleece the hopeful and defraud the gullible.
I believe that some of the water on Earth is also thought to have come from 'somewhere' non-terrestrial too. See this link and also look at Wiki.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
12K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K