Upper and Lower Darboux Sum Inequality

  • I
  • Thread starter Magnetons
  • Start date
  • #1
Magnetons
13
4
TL;DR Summary
L(f,P) ##\leq## L(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,P)
Lemma
Let f be a bounded function on [a,b]. If P & Q are partitions of [a,b] and P ##\subseteq## Q , then

L(f,P) ##\leq## L(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,P) .

Question is "How can P have bigger upper darboux sum than Q while it is a subset of Q"
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
FactChecker
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
7,723
3,392
The finer partition will be as close or closer in both upper and lower sum to the limit than the courser partition. For the upper sum, the supremums of the courser partition are still there, but they are applied to smaller ##\Delta x##s.
 
  • #3
Magnetons
13
4
The finer partition will be as close or closer in both upper and lower sum to the limit than the courser partition. For the upper sum, the supremums of the courser partition are still there, but they are applied to smaller ##\Delta x##s.
 

Suggested for: Upper and Lower Darboux Sum Inequality

Replies
14
Views
620
Replies
1
Views
939
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
908
Top