I Upper and Lower Darboux Sum Inequality

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Magnetons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Sum
Magnetons
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
L(f,P) ##\leq## L(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,P)
Lemma
Let f be a bounded function on [a,b]. If P & Q are partitions of [a,b] and P ##\subseteq## Q , then

L(f,P) ##\leq## L(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,Q) ##\leq## U(f,P) .

Question is "How can P have bigger upper darboux sum than Q while it is a subset of Q"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The finer partition will be as close or closer in both upper and lower sum to the limit than the courser partition. For the upper sum, the supremums of the courser partition are still there, but they are applied to smaller ##\Delta x##s.
 
  • Like
Likes mathguy_1995 and Magnetons
FactChecker said:
The finer partition will be as close or closer in both upper and lower sum to the limit than the courser partition. For the upper sum, the supremums of the courser partition are still there, but they are applied to smaller ##\Delta x##s.
 
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...
Back
Top