Upthrust in a fully submerged object

  • Thread starter Thread starter Himal kharel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Submerged Upthrust
Click For Summary
An object submerged in a fluid experiences upthrust, or buoyant force, which equals the weight of the fluid displaced. When an iron cube sinks to the bottom of a beaker, it no longer displaces water below it, leading to a situation where the gravitational force exceeds the buoyant force. Consequently, the beaker exerts an additional force to maintain equilibrium for the cube. If the cube is stationary, the force on its bottom equals its weight plus the weight of the water column above it. If there is no water beneath the cube, the force is solely from the beaker's bottom; if water is present, the force is shared between the beaker and the water.
Himal kharel
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
When we put any object in a fluid it experiences upthrust. Suppose an iron cube is put in a beaker with water. It sinks and reaches bottom. When it reaches bottom and touches the base of beaker there is no water below it. Then will it experience upthrust?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The block experiences a buoyant force equal to the weight of the volume of water displaced...After it sinks to the bottom,because the weight imparted by gravity exceeds the buoyant force, the beaker then exerts an additional force sufficient to keep the block in equilibrium...
 
There is no water below cube. So pressure is exerted on all sides except bottom.
Is my assertion right?
 
If the cube is stationary, its bottom will experience a force equal to the weight of the cube plus the weight of the water in the column above the cube. (Plus the weight of the air in that column extended to the edge of the atmosphere, if we want to be persnickity.) If there is truly no water beneath the cube, that force will be exerted by the bottom of the beaker. If there is some water beneath the cube, the force will be distributed between the beaker and the water.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K