US News Rankings: How Much Do They Matter for Graduate Programs?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relevance of US News rankings for graduate programs, particularly in mathematics and physics. Participants explore the weight these rankings should carry in decision-making for prospective students, considering various factors such as subfield specialization and adviser quality.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the importance of US News rankings, suggesting that for physics Ph.D. programs in the US, rankings are less significant than the quality of the adviser.
  • Others argue that rankings can serve as a general grouping tool, indicating broad differences between schools but may not reflect finer distinctions within subgroups.
  • A participant emphasizes the need to evaluate faculty and their research output as a more reliable indicator of program quality than rankings.
  • Concerns are raised about the subjective nature of rankings, particularly in specialized areas such as topology or partial differential equations (PDEs).
  • Some participants suggest that the decision should be based on personal fit and alignment with research interests rather than solely on rankings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of US News rankings, with no consensus on their overall importance. While some see value in rankings for general comparisons, others believe they are not particularly useful for specific subfields or individual program quality.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the subjective nature of ranking methodologies and the potential variability in the quality of programs based on individual research interests and adviser relationships.

PhDorBust
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
When choosing a graduate program, how much weight should be given to its US News ranking?

I've been accepted to two schools which fall within the top 10 for general math, but for my particular subarea in math, one of them ranks about 15 spots ahead of the other. Do people actually care about these rankings? Is there any better indicator of goodness? Phds.org gives some data points but their accuracy is not too great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much weight? As much as you choose - how important is it to you to say "I graduated from a school that is Nth on the USNews Rankings"?
 
PhDorBust said:
When choosing a graduate program, how much weight should be given to its US News ranking?

In physics schools in the United States. None at all.

I've been accepted to two schools which fall within the top 10 for general math, but for my particular subarea in math, one of them ranks about 15 spots ahead of the other. Do people actually care about these rankings?

For MBA's people care a lot. For physics schools in Mainland China, people also care a lot about rankings. For physics Ph.D.'s in the US, no one cares about general school rankings. In fact, people care a lot less about your school than your adviser.

Is there any better indicator of goodness? Phds.org gives some data points but their accuracy is not too great.

Go to the web site, look at the list of professors, track down the papers that they wrote, and you should be able to make your own judgments about goodness. Also for the smaller departments, you will influence the quality of the department more than the department influences you.
 
When it comes to general rankings, these rankings should be used primarily for grouping schools into groups. That is a school in the top 10 is obviously different than a school in the 20-30 range, but withing these subgroups the differences may not matter as much. The best advice I can give is to ask people in your department (and subfield) about the quality of the schools and look up the professors who work there. If the papers being published and the research being done looks like its your kind of thing, then go for that school. Remember, you are going to a Ph.D program to study a topic of your choosing for 5-7 years with an adviser who's work should hopefully line up with your interests as closely as possible.

Now in terms of subareas, I personally don't trust the rankings as much. I don't know, I don't feel the method used by US news world and report is the best one for figuring at what school has the best topology or PDEs group because those things can get very subjective. Congrats on being accepted to such great schools, but now comes the harder part about deciding for yourself which one is better for you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 119 ·
4
Replies
119
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K