US spy operation that manipulates social media

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter m k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Social media
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the U.S. military's covert operations to manipulate social media, raising concerns about creating false consensus and suppressing dissenting opinions. Critics argue that these tactics, while not officially deployed on U.S. platforms, could undermine public trust and facilitate propaganda. The conversation highlights the historical context of similar operations and the effectiveness of psychological operations (psy-ops) in influencing public opinion, particularly in conflict zones. Participants also discuss the ethical implications and potential countermeasures against such manipulations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of psychological operations (psy-ops) in military contexts
  • Familiarity with social media dynamics and manipulation techniques
  • Knowledge of online privacy and security measures
  • Awareness of historical examples of information warfare
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of psychological operations in modern warfare
  • Explore countermeasures against social media manipulation techniques
  • Investigate the role of algorithms in shaping public opinion on platforms like Google and Facebook
  • Study case studies of successful and failed military psy-ops campaigns
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for military strategists, social media analysts, cybersecurity professionals, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology and information warfare.

  • #31


so apparently, there is this guy named http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein" who works for Obama.

sock puppets as a way to mold public opinion just may be his baby, as he's proposed it before:
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/15/sunstein
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1084585

his homepage is currently 404'd: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/regulatory_affairs/default/

from wiki, he has some particularly disturbing views on free speech. apparently, he's a little put out that his views aren't getting the attention they deserve. maybe more attention is exactly what Sunstein needs. they say sunlight is the best disinfectant, so i will do my wee part here to put him under the magnifying glass.
First Amendment

In his book Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech Sunstein says there is a need to reformulate First Amendment law. He thinks that the current formulation, based on Justice Holmes' conception of free speech as a marketplace “disserves the aspirations of those who wrote America’s founding document.”[14] The purpose of this reformulation would be to “reinvigorate processes of democratic deliberation, by ensuring greater attention to public issues and greater diversity of views.”[15] He is concerned by the present “situation in which like-minded people speak or listen mostly to one another,”[16] and thinks that in “light of astonishing economic and technological changes, we must doubt whether, as interpreted, the constitutional guarantee of free speech is adequately serving democratic goals.”[17] He proposes a “New Deal for speech [that] would draw on Justice Brandeis' insistence on the role of free speech in promoting political deliberation and citizenship.”[15]

and apparently, covert propaganda isn't even legal in the US.
http://www.prwatch.org/node/7261
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #33


WhoWee said:
Don't forget the Mrs. (Cass Sunstein) ->>> Samantha Power.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/magazine/16Sunstein-t.html

yeah, i have her http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Problem_from_Hell" . still waiting to see how she turns out. whether marginally better than the old school, or just more of the same. so far tho, our intervention policy does not seem to deviate from the american interests only routine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K