Undergrad Use of polarization to experimentally check photon mass?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the potential of using polarization to experimentally measure an upper limit on photon mass. It suggests an experiment involving laser beams and polarizing sheets, where differences in intensity could indicate whether photons have mass based on their spin axis alignment with propagation direction. The proposed setup would require careful calibration and precise measurements to account for other factors affecting intensity. The author seeks information on whether similar experiments have been conducted, referencing a paper that discusses polarization effects but does not mention this specific experiment. Further analysis of the experimental parameters is deemed necessary for feasibility.
Bolhuso
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Hi all!

I've checked Wikipedia and a related thread regarding experimentally measuring an upper limit for the photon rest mass:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Experimental_checks_on_photon_mass
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/photon-rest-mass-0-wasnt-proven-experimentally.792583/

I was thinking of another experiment which may be possible to set up in laboratory conditions.

As I understand the specific polarization properties of the photon are related to its spin axis being oriented in the direction of its propagation, and this is only possible due to the photon having zero rest mass.

Based on this I was thinking of an experiment in which we first point a laser beam to a polarizing sheet and measure the intensity behind. Then we place another polarizing sheet some relevant long distance away (maybe we could simulate long distance with mirrors) and measure the intensity behind.

If they differ (after other factors have been accounted for) that would indicate that the spin axis is not exactly aligned with the direction of the propagation, and therefore the photon indeed has mass. If they don't (as I would expect), the parameters (distance...) of the experiment could be used to determine the upper limit to the photon mass.

I have not done a detailed analysis of the parameters, but I would expect that if the principles in this experiment are right, the parameters could be designed to be able to make very fine measurements.

As a matter of fact I can imagine that the actual experiment would require some fine calibration and maybe some slight redesign (e.g. to reduce the contribution of other effects to the dimming of the intensity, we could devise the experiment such as the second polariser can be rotated with high precision. In this case we would just need to find the angle, relative to the first polariser, at which the intensity is the max, instead of comparing intensities. It comes without saying that this would require to be able to precisely measure the angle at which both polarisers are set with high precision).

My question is: is anyone aware of such experiment (or a similar one) having been performed?

Specifically the paper in the other thread

https://www.princeton.edu/~romalis/PHYS312/Coulomb Ref/TuCoulomb.pdf

says in 3.2 "All those effects [polarization] are useful approaches for laboratory experiments", but in table 1 there is not mention of such experiment having been performed.

So, do you know if it has been done?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bolhuso said:
I have not done a detailed analysis of the parameters

That's really your next step, then.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
7K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K