MHB Use the formal definition to prove that the following sequence diverges

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
$\displaystyle s_n=\left(\frac1n-1\right)^n$

My attempt:

For large $n$, the sequence oscillates between $e^{-1}$ and $-e^{-1}$ and therefore diverges. Now for the proof.

Assume, for the sake of argument, that the sequence converges to $L$.

$\exists N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $|s_n-L|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$

$\displaystyle\left|\left(\frac1n-1\right)^n-L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$

$\displaystyle\implies\left|\left(\frac1{n+1}-1\right)^{n+1}-L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$

We can rewrite these 2 equations as

$\displaystyle\left|(-1)^n\left(1-\frac1n\right)^n-L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$ --------------- (1)

$\displaystyle\left|(-1)^{n+1}\left(1-\frac1{n+1}\right)^{n+1}-L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$

$\displaystyle\implies\left|(-1)^n\left(1-\frac1{n+1}\right)^{n+1}+L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$ --------------- (2)

How do I get a contradiction from equations (1) and (2)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
$\displaystyle\left|(-1)^n\left(1-\frac1n\right)^n-L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$ --------------- (1)

$\displaystyle\left|(-1)^{n+1}\left(1-\frac1{n+1}\right)^{n+1}-L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$

$\displaystyle\implies\left|(-1)^n\left(1-\frac1{n+1}\right)^{n+1}+L\right|<0.1$ whenever $n\ge N$ --------------- (2)

How do I get a contradiction from equations (1) and (2)?
If it is known that $(1-1/n)^n\to1/e$, then you can reason as follows. Suppose $|(1-1/n)^n-1/e|\le0.1$ for all $n\ge N$ (we can achieve this increasing $N$ if necessary). Then (1) with an even $n$ implies that $|L-1/e|<0.2$ and therefore $L>1/e-0.2>0$ and (2) implies that $|(-L)-1/e|<0.2$ and therefore $L<-1/e+0.2<0$, which is a contradiction.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K