Using a probability argument I got the sum. Can it be done directly?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical summation involving combinatorial probabilities, specifically the expression ##\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n-m} \frac{\binom{n-m}{k}}{\binom{n}{k}}\frac{m}{n-k}=1##. Participants explore whether this can be derived directly or through induction, considering various assumptions about the parameters involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the summation represents probabilities related to the minimum label of selected marbles from a set.
  • Questions arise about the assumption ##2m \geq n##, with corrections indicating that ##m## can take any value up to ##n##.
  • One participant suggests rephrasing the statement using ##N:=n-m## and proposes an induction approach, claiming it holds for small values of ##N##.
  • Concerns are raised about the correctness of the formula, particularly regarding the denominator in the product and the overall sum equating to 1.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of induction, suggesting that direct calculation might be more appropriate.
  • Some participants note that while induction seems promising, it may lead to complications that hinder its application.
  • There is a suggestion that for specific values of ##m## (like ##m=n## or ##m=n-1##), direct checks can be performed.
  • One participant mentions that while a direct calculation could be tedious, it appears feasible for each ##N## or ##m##.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to prove the summation, with some favoring induction and others advocating for direct calculation. No consensus is reached on the most effective method.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential errors in earlier claims and the need for careful consideration of assumptions, particularly regarding the parameters ##n## and ##m##. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the validity of various proposed methods.

mathman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
8,130
Reaction score
575
TL;DR
Using a probability argument I got the sum. Can it be done directly?
##\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n-m} \frac{\binom{n-m}{k}}{\binom{n}{k}}\frac{m}{n-k}=1##. Can be derived from question. For ##n\ge m##, pick ##m## marbled out of a set size ##n## labeled from ##1## to ##n##, what is probability distribution of minimum of the number labels on the marbles? The terms is the summation are probabilities that minimum label ##=k+1##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
May we assume ##2m\geq n##?
 
fresh_42 said:
May we assume ##2m\geq n##?
Error in original post - has been corrected. m can be anything up to n.
 
We can set ##N:=n-m## and rephrase the statement as
$$
\sum_{k=0}^N\prod_{j=1}^k\dfrac{N-j+1}{n-j}=\dfrac{n}{n-N}
$$
and attempt an induction on ##N##. It is true for ##N=0,1,2.##
I think that such an induction is the best way to prove it.
 
Last edited:
The sum should = 1, why n/m? Also the denominator in the product should be n-j+1.
 
mathman said:
The sum should = 1, why n/m? Also the denominator in the product should be n-j+1.
No, I distributed ##\dfrac{m}{n}## out of the sum and put it on the other side. My formula is correct (I think). I only skipped a few elementary calculation steps.

Edit: By checking the calculation for ##N=2## I saw that multiplying with the common denominator is probably better than an induction. The induction brought a weighted sum such that the induction hypothesis couldn't be applied.
 
Last edited:
At the opposite end, m=n or m=n-1 can be checked directly. Math induction probably won't work. There might be a tricky way to do the sum, but I have no ideas.
 
There is still a little work to do, but I broke it down to an inductionable statement:
$$
\sum_{k=0}^N\prod_{j=1}^k\dfrac{N-j+1}{n-j}=\dfrac{n}{n-N}
$$
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{n}{n-N}&= 1+\dfrac{N}{n-1}+\dfrac{N(N-1)}{(n-1)(n-2)}+\ldots+\dfrac{N}{n-1}\cdots \dfrac{1}{n-N}\\
\dfrac{n!}{n-N}&=(n-1)!+N(n-2)!+N(N-1)(n-3)!+\ldots +N!\\
n!&=(n-1)!(n-N)+N(n-N)(n-2)!+\ldots +N!(n-N)
\end{align*}
Now it is in a form where we can perform an induction.
\begin{align*}
N=0\, &: \,(n-1)!(n-0)=n!\\
N=1\, &: \,(n-1)!(n-1)+(n-1)(n-2)!=(n-1)!(n-1+1)=n!\\
N=2\, &: \,(n-1)!(n-2)+2(n-2)(n-2)!+2(n-2)(n-3)!\\
\phantom{N=2\, }&\phantom{\,=}=(n-2)!((n-1)(n-2)+2(n-2)+2)\\
\phantom{N=2\, }&\phantom{\,=}=(n-2)!(n^2-3n+2+2n-4+2)=(n-2)!(n^2-n)=n!
\end{align*}
 
I see it as a direct calculation. I don't see the induction?
 
  • #10
mathman said:
I see it as a direct calculation. I don't see the induction?
I haven't checked. Maybe it can be done directly.
 
  • #11
As far as I can tell, for each N (or m) it could be done directly. This is tedious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K