C/C++ Using C++ Relational Ops to Check if a Number is Even

  • Thread starter Thread starter ineedhelpnow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    C++
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a number is even in C++, the expression userNum % 2 == 0 is used. The modulo operator (%) calculates the remainder of userNum when divided by 2. If the result is 0, the number is even; if it is 1, the number is odd. This behavior holds true for nonnegative integers, where the remainder can only be 0 or 1. However, for negative integers, the result of the modulo operation can be negative, which is defined by the C++ standard. This can lead to confusion, as the modulo operation is not strictly the same as the mathematical definition of modulo. It is advisable to use the modulo operator with unsigned integers to avoid potential issues.
ineedhelpnow
Messages
649
Reaction score
0
Write an expression that will print "Even" if the value of userNum is an even number.

Code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

int main() {
   int userNum = 0;

   userNum = 6;

   if (<STUDENT CODE>) { 
      cout << "Even" << endl; 
   }
   else {
      cout << "Odd" << endl;
   }

   return 0;
}

the <STUDENT CODE> is
Code:
userNum %2==0

i understand the %2 part but why equal to 0? how does the ==0 part detect that its an even number?
 
Technology news on Phys.org
x %2 gives the remainder of x when divided by 2.

for odd numebr x %2 = 1 and for even number x % 2 = 0

so this check is made
 
will it always be either x%2==0 or x%2==1?
 
ineedhelpnow said:
will it always be either x%2==0 or x%2==1?

Yes it shall be as when we divide by 2 remainder can be 0 or 1 and no other value
 
kaliprasad said:
Yes it shall be as when we divide by 2 remainder can be 0 or 1 and no other value

As long as userNum is nonnegative. If it is negative then the result will be 0 or -1, as defined by the C++ standard (which itself follows the Fortran definition of the modulo operation). In short, % is not "modulo", it's "division remainder", which may be negative as integer division always rounds towards zero, not negative infinity.

For instance, let $q$ be the quotient of $-3$ divided by $2$, which is $q = -1$ (round towards zero). Then $r = (-3) ~ \% ~ 2$ is defined as the unique integer satisfying $2q + r = -3$, that is, $r =-1$. So (-3) % 2 = -1.

That is also why I recommend only using % when working with unsigned integer types. It's very easy for people to mistake it for a modulo operation and introduce major security issues that can become very hard to find.

(well, to be specific up until the recent C++11, the sign of (-3) % 2 was implementation-defined, but essentially every processor on the planet will have returned -1; now, it must return -1)​
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...

Similar threads

Back
Top